PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMNY vs. MEAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMNY vs. MEAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY) and iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMNY achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than MEAR's 0.52% return.


RMNY

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
0.92%
6M
2.13%
1Y
2.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MEAR

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
0.52%
6M
1.21%
1Y
3.40%
3Y*
3.49%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
1.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMNY vs. MEAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
RMNY
Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF
0.92%2.35%0.86%
MEAR
iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF
0.52%3.76%0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between RMNY and MEAR is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners. Combining low-correlation assets is one of the most reliable ways to reduce portfolio risk without sacrificing expected returns.


RMNY vs. MEAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMNY has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than MEAR's 0.25% expense ratio.


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMNY vs. MEAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMNY
RMNY Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
RMNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMNY Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
RMNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMNY Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

MEAR
MEAR Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
MEAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MEAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMNY vs. MEAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY) and iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMNYMEARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.48

3.10

-2.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.66

4.28

-3.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.82

-0.71

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

3.76

-3.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.64

20.79

-19.15

RMNY vs. MEAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the MEAR Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMNY and MEAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMNYMEARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

3.10

-2.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

1.09

-0.61

Drawdowns

RMNY vs. MEAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMNY drawdown since its inception was -5.70%, which is greater than MEAR's maximum drawdown of -2.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMNY and MEAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RMNYMEARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-2.68%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-0.47%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-2.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.30%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-0.19%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

0.15%

+1.88%

Volatility

RMNY vs. MEAR - Volatility Comparison

Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY) has a higher volatility of 1.94% compared to iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR) at 0.37%. This indicates that RMNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RMNYMEARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.94%

0.37%

+1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.60%

0.59%

+2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.65%

1.11%

+4.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.33%

0.98%

+4.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.33%

1.52%

+3.81%

Dividends

RMNY vs. MEAR - Dividend Comparison

RMNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than MEAR's 2.87% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RMNY
Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF
4.13%4.10%1.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MEAR
iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF
2.87%2.95%3.44%3.30%0.88%0.30%0.90%1.57%1.36%1.01%0.81%0.53%