RMNY vs. CALI
RMNY (Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF) and CALI (iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. RMNY is actively managed, while CALI is passively managed. Over the past year, RMNY returned 7.52% vs 2.79% for CALI. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RMNY charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for CALI.
Performance
RMNY vs. CALI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMNY achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly higher than CALI's 0.99% return.
RMNY
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 3.12%
- 1Y
- 7.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CALI
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 2.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RMNY vs. CALI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RMNY Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF | 2.88% | 2.35% | 0.80% |
CALI iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF | 0.99% | 3.28% | 0.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMNY and CALI is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2024 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMNY vs. CALI — Risk / Return Rank
RMNY
CALI
RMNY vs. CALI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY) and iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF (CALI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMNY | CALI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.87 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 4.19 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.89 | 21.38 | -10.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMNY vs. CALI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMNY drawdown since its inception was -5.70%, which is greater than CALI's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMNY and CALI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMNY | CALI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -0.78% | -4.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.28% | -0.67% | -1.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.04% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -0.08% | -1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 0.13% | +0.56% |
Volatility
RMNY vs. CALI - Volatility Comparison
Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF (CALI) at 0.19%. This indicates that RMNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CALI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMNY | CALI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 0.19% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | 0.52% | +2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 0.75% | +3.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.15% | 1.10% | +4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.15% | 1.10% | +4.05% |
RMNY vs. CALI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMNY has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CALI's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
RMNY vs. CALI - Dividend Comparison
RMNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than CALI's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CALI iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF | 2.52% | 2.62% | 3.14% | 1.37% |
RMNY Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF | 4.29% | 4.10% | 1.31% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RMNY and CALI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMNY has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to CALI (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMNY dropped -5.70% vs CALI's -0.78%.
On 1-year performance, RMNY leads with 7.52% vs 2.79% for CALI. On fees, CALI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, CALI has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RMNY has performed better with a 7.52% return vs 2.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CALI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for RMNY.
RMNY has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 2.52% for CALI.
They also come from different issuers: Rockefeller and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for RMNY and 0.08% for CALI.
CALI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RMNY and CALI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer