PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RMLPX vs. FMGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

RMLPX vs. FMGIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX) and Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX).

RMLPX is managed by Rrecurrent Advisors. It was launched on Nov 1, 2017. FMGIX is managed by Frontier Funds. It was launched on Jan 17, 2012.

Performance

RMLPX vs. FMGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX) and Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RMLPX vs. FMGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RMLPX
Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund		31.75%8.98%30.03%16.79%35.03%42.56%-28.37%15.33%-15.93%
FMGIX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund		6.75%22.67%34.26%4.86%-9.46%13.84%-1.36%28.00%-6.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMLPX achieves a 31.75% return, which is significantly higher than FMGIX's 6.75% return.

RMLPX

1D
-0.94%
1M
10.14%
YTD
31.75%
6M
31.23%
1Y
36.53%
3Y*
29.25%
5Y*
28.54%
10Y*
—

FMGIX

1D
0.80%
1M
-5.22%
YTD
6.75%
6M
8.05%
1Y
20.40%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
13.22%
10Y*
10.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund

Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund

Often compared with RMLPX:
RMLPX vs. VOORMLPX vs. CSUIXRMLPX vs. FSENXRMLPX vs. PRNEXRMLPX vs. DHIVXRMLPX vs. PAXDXRMLPX vs. RSNRX
Often compared with FMGIX:
FMGIX vs. AIFRXFMGIX vs. CFWAXFMGIX vs. NMFIXFMGIX vs. KYNFMGIX vs. FNARXFMGIX vs. TORIXFMGIX vs. APWEX

RMLPX vs. FMGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMLPX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FMGIX's 0.50% expense ratio.

RMLPX
Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund
FMGIX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund

Return for Risk

RMLPX vs. FMGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RMLPX
RMLPX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RMLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
RMLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
FMGIX
FMGIX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FMGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FMGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMLPX vs. FMGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX) and Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

RMLPXFMGIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.87

1.75

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.33

2.26

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.34

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

2.81

-0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.80

10.65

-1.85

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RMLPX vs. FMGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMLPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the FMGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMLPX and FMGIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

RMLPXFMGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.75

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.35

0.47

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.19

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.24

+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between RMLPX and FMGIX is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RMLPX vs. FMGIX - Dividend Comparison

RMLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, less than FMGIX's 31.50% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RMLPX
Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund		4.89%6.38%7.63%6.49%7.08%8.89%13.48%7.25%5.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FMGIX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund		31.50%33.65%48.77%4.79%3.98%2.63%2.38%2.63%3.09%3.15%2.83%2.79%

Drawdowns

RMLPX vs. FMGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMLPX drawdown since its inception was -66.95%, which is greater than FMGIX's maximum drawdown of -57.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMLPX and FMGIX.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

RMLPXFMGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.95%

-57.57%

-9.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.37%

-7.74%

-8.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.83%

-26.61%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-57.57%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-5.22%

+4.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-5.37%

-5.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

2.04%

+2.12%

Volatility

RMLPX vs. FMGIX - Volatility Comparison

Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX) at 3.97%. This indicates that RMLPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

RMLPXFMGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

3.97%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.03%

6.97%

+4.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.93%

11.91%

+8.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.32%

28.44%

-7.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.16%

52.56%

-24.40%