PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMDFX vs. MAFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMDFX vs. MAFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX) and Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I (MAFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMDFX achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly lower than MAFIX's 13.53% return.


RMDFX

1D
0.24%
1M
2.08%
YTD
7.32%
6M
8.74%
1Y
19.98%
3Y*
11.18%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*
5.40%

MAFIX

1D
0.23%
1M
4.22%
YTD
13.53%
6M
15.28%
1Y
34.23%
3Y*
11.01%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMDFX vs. MAFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RMDFX
Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund
7.32%18.85%1.45%8.01%-6.84%4.20%5.10%11.50%-1.12%
MAFIX
Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I
13.53%8.41%8.99%5.02%4.08%14.79%24.89%21.63%-1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between RMDFX and MAFIX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2018

0.50

The correlation between RMDFX and MAFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (5 years) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMDFX vs. MAFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMDFX
RMDFX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
RMDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
RMDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

MAFIX
MAFIX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MAFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MAFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMDFX vs. MAFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX) and Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I (MAFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMDFXMAFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.33

2.77

+1.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.13

3.69

+2.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.97

1.49

+0.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.79

4.74

+0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.77

16.70

+2.07

RMDFX vs. MAFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMDFX Sharpe Ratio is 4.33, which is higher than the MAFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMDFX and MAFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMDFXMAFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.33

2.77

+1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.66

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

1.03

-0.19

Drawdowns

RMDFX vs. MAFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMDFX drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, smaller than the maximum MAFIX drawdown of -19.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMDFX and MAFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMDFXMAFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.96%

-19.21%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.19%

-7.26%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.79%

-19.21%

+13.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.63%

-19.21%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.33%

-3.41%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

2.05%

-0.98%

Volatility

RMDFX vs. MAFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX) is 1.47%, while Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I (MAFIX) has a volatility of 2.69%. This indicates that RMDFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMDFXMAFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

2.69%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.96%

8.84%

-4.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.64%

12.43%

-7.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.34%

12.32%

-5.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.23%

12.84%

-6.61%

RMDFX vs. MAFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMDFX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MAFIX's 1.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMDFX vs. MAFIX - Dividend Comparison

RMDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than MAFIX's 10.37% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MAFIX
Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I
10.37%11.78%4.57%3.80%4.12%10.65%10.29%12.30%9.36%0.00%0.00%
RMDFX
Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund
4.32%4.63%0.00%3.69%0.78%5.37%2.28%3.78%4.11%2.16%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMDFX and MAFIX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAFIX has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to RMDFX (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMDFX dropped -15.96% vs MAFIX's -19.21%.

RMDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.33 vs 2.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMDFX and MAFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer