RMDFX vs. ADANX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RMDFX (Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund) and ADANX (AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 10 years, RMDFX returned 5.40%/yr vs 6.59%/yr for ADANX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RMDFX charges 0.18%/yr vs 2.12%/yr for ADANX.

Performance

RMDFX vs. ADANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX) and AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N (ADANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMDFX achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly higher than ADANX's 2.89% return. Over the past 10 years, RMDFX has underperformed ADANX with an annualized return of 5.40%, while ADANX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.59% annualized return.

RMDFX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 2.08%
• YTD: 7.32%
• 6M: 8.74%
• 1Y: 19.98%
• 3Y*: 11.18%
• 5Y*: 5.28%
• 10Y*: 5.40%

ADANX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 2.89%
• 6M: 3.35%
• 1Y: 6.47%
• 3Y*: 5.98%
• 5Y*: 2.73%
• 10Y*: 6.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMDFX vs. ADANX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RMDFX Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund	7.32%	18.85%	1.45%	8.01%	-6.84%	4.20%	5.10%	11.50%	-4.89%	9.41%
ADANX AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N	2.89%	7.75%	2.92%	4.23%	-3.54%	5.99%	24.85%	8.33%	2.02%	5.59%

Correlation

The correlation between RMDFX and ADANX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.25

Over the past year, the correlation between RMDFX and ADANX has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

RMDFX vs. ADANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMDFX

RMDFX Risk / Return Rank: 95
RMDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
RMDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RMDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
RMDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
RMDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

ADANX

ADANX Risk / Return Rank: 99
ADANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ADANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
ADANX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ADANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ADANX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMDFX vs. ADANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX) and AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N (ADANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RMDFX	ADANX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.33	4.57	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.13	7.88	-1.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.97	2.13	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.79	16.47	-11.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.77	45.54	-26.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RMDFX vs. ADANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMDFX Sharpe Ratio is 4.33, which is comparable to the ADANX Sharpe Ratio of 4.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMDFX and ADANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RMDFX	ADANX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.33	4.57	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	1.05	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87	1.54	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	1.15	-0.31

Drawdowns

RMDFX vs. ADANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMDFX drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, which is greater than ADANX's maximum drawdown of -14.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMDFX and ADANX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RMDFX	ADANX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.96%	-14.73%	-1.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.19%	-0.39%	-3.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.79%	-1.70%	-4.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.63%	-7.48%	-7.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.96%	-14.73%	-1.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.08%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.33%	-3.03%	-0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.07%	0.14%	+0.93%

Volatility

RMDFX vs. ADANX - Volatility Comparison

Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX) has a higher volatility of 1.47% compared to AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N (ADANX) at 0.39%. This indicates that RMDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RMDFX	ADANX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.47%	0.39%	+1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.96%	1.07%	+2.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.64%	1.43%	+3.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.34%	2.62%	+3.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.23%	4.28%	+1.95%

RMDFX vs. ADANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMDFX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ADANX's 2.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

RMDFX vs. ADANX - Dividend Comparison

RMDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than ADANX's 1.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ADANX AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N	1.80%	1.86%	0.96%	2.47%	0.10%	0.40%	1.33%	1.81%	6.22%	6.84%	6.83%	4.43%
RMDFX Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund	4.32%	4.63%	0.00%	3.69%	0.78%	5.37%	2.28%	3.78%	4.11%	2.16%	1.16%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RMDFX and ADANX in my portfolio?

RMDFX and ADANX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RMDFX or ADANX?

RMDFX has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to ADANX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMDFX dropped -15.96% vs ADANX's -14.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ADANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.57 vs 4.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.