RMD vs. CS.PA
RMD (ResMed Inc.) and CS.PA (AXA SA) are both stocks. RMD operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while CS.PA operates in Insurance - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, RMD returned 13.97%/yr vs 14.30%/yr for CS.PA. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RMD vs. CS.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RMD is traded in USD, while CS.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CS.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMD achieves a -19.56% return, which is significantly lower than CS.PA's 6.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RMD having a 13.97% annualized return and CS.PA not far ahead at 14.30%.
RMD
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- -19.56%
- 6M
- -23.44%
- 1Y
- -21.94%
- 3Y*
- -3.23%
- 5Y*
- -3.18%
- 10Y*
- 13.97%
CS.PA
- 1D
- 2.72%
- 1M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- 6.96%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 7.04%
- 3Y*
- 25.83%
- 5Y*
- 19.05%
- 10Y*
- 14.30%
RMD vs. CS.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMD ResMed Inc. | -19.56% | 6.26% | 34.18% | -16.55% | -19.47% | 23.41% | 38.33% | 37.85% | 36.38% | 39.06% |
CS.PA AXA SA | 6.96% | 42.62% | 15.89% | 24.04% | -0.21% | 32.91% | -12.08% | 38.36% | -23.27% | 23.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMD and CS.PA is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2007 | 0.23 |
The correlation between RMD and CS.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (3 years) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMD vs. CS.PA — Risk / Return Rank
RMD
CS.PA
RMD vs. CS.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ResMed Inc. (RMD) and AXA SA (CS.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMD | CS.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.08 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 0.48 | -1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 0.85 | -2.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMD vs. CS.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMD drawdown since its inception was -61.61%, smaller than the maximum CS.PA drawdown of -79.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMD and CS.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMD | CS.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.61% | -79.24% | +17.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.28% | -14.59% | -22.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.09% | -16.15% | -23.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.99% | -32.50% | -21.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.99% | -55.59% | +1.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.88% | 0.00% | -33.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.00% | -19.05% | +3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.63% | 8.21% | +8.42% |
Volatility
RMD vs. CS.PA - Volatility Comparison
ResMed Inc. (RMD) has a higher volatility of 9.84% compared to AXA SA (CS.PA) at 5.41%. This indicates that RMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CS.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMD | CS.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.84% | 5.41% | +4.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.31% | 15.27% | +4.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.13% | 21.22% | +2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.95% | 23.87% | +7.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.55% | 26.68% | +4.87% |
Dividends
RMD vs. CS.PA - Dividend Comparison
RMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than CS.PA's 5.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CS.PA AXA SA | 5.54% | 5.25% | 5.77% | 5.76% | 5.91% | 5.46% | 3.74% | 5.34% | 6.68% | 4.69% | 4.59% | 3.77% |
RMD ResMed Inc. | 1.25% | 0.94% | 0.88% | 1.07% | 0.83% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.98% | 1.26% | 1.61% | 2.03% | 2.16% |
Financials
RMD vs. CS.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ResMed Inc. and AXA SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RMD and CS.PA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for RMD and CS.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer