PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMD vs. CBOE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RMD vs. CBOE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ResMed Inc. (RMD) and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMD achieves a -19.39% return, which is significantly lower than CBOE's 12.19% return. Over the past 10 years, RMD has underperformed CBOE with an annualized return of 13.71%, while CBOE has yielded a comparatively higher 17.38% annualized return.


RMD

1D
-1.48%
1M
-6.31%
YTD
-19.39%
6M
-22.35%
1Y
-22.67%
3Y*
-2.34%
5Y*
-0.97%
10Y*
13.71%

CBOE

1D
-0.56%
1M
-19.41%
YTD
12.19%
6M
11.21%
1Y
27.25%
3Y*
27.99%
5Y*
21.30%
10Y*
17.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMD vs. CBOE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMD
ResMed Inc.
-19.39%6.26%34.18%-16.55%-19.47%23.41%38.33%37.85%36.38%39.06%
CBOE
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
12.19%29.96%10.74%44.37%-2.16%42.23%-21.17%24.16%-20.60%70.49%

Correlation

The correlation between RMD and CBOE is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2010

0.21

The correlation between RMD and CBOE shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (3 years) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

RMD:

$13.78

CBOE:

$11.77

PE Ratio

RMD:

14.02

CBOE:

23.83

PEG Ratio

RMD:

0.43

CBOE:

0.44

PS Ratio

RMD:

3.85

CBOE:

6.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

RMD:

$5.54B

CBOE:

$4.79B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RMD:

$3.42B

CBOE:

$2.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

RMD:

$2.10B

CBOE:

$1.87B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMD vs. CBOE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMD
RMD Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
RMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMD Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
RMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMD Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

CBOE
CBOE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CBOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBOE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CBOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBOE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMD vs. CBOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ResMed Inc. (RMD) and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMDCBOEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.20

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

1.11

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.42

5.44

-6.86

RMD vs. CBOE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMD Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the CBOE Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMD and CBOE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMDCBOEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.95

1.01

-1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.92

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.69

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.66

-0.14

Drawdowns

RMD vs. CBOE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMD drawdown since its inception was -61.61%, which is greater than CBOE's maximum drawdown of -43.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMD and CBOE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMDCBOEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.61%

-43.23%

-18.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.28%

-24.69%

-12.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.09%

-24.69%

-15.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.99%

-24.69%

-29.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.99%

-43.23%

-10.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.74%

-23.40%

-10.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.98%

-11.40%

-4.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.95%

5.02%

+10.93%

Volatility

RMD vs. CBOE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ResMed Inc. (RMD) is 10.44%, while Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) has a volatility of 15.60%. This indicates that RMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMDCBOEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.44%

15.60%

-5.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.50%

23.74%

-4.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.97%

27.02%

-3.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.12%

23.17%

+7.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.55%

25.32%

+6.23%

Dividends

RMD vs. CBOE - Dividend Comparison

RMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than CBOE's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBOE
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
1.03%1.08%1.21%1.18%1.56%1.38%1.68%1.12%1.19%0.83%1.30%1.36%
RMD
ResMed Inc.
1.24%0.94%0.88%1.07%0.83%0.62%0.73%0.98%1.26%1.61%2.03%2.16%

Financials

RMD vs. CBOE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ResMed Inc. and Cboe Global Markets, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


800.00M900.00M1.00B1.10B1.20B1.30B1.40B20222023202420252026
1.43B
1.27B
(RMD) Total Revenue
(CBOE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RMD vs. CBOE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ResMed Inc. and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
62.3%
52.6%
Portfolio components
RMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a gross profit of 890.98M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.3%.

CBOE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a gross profit of 669.90M and revenue of 1.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.6%.

RMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported an operating income of 499.81M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.

CBOE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported an operating income of 505.60M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.7%.

RMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a net income of 398.73M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 27.9%.

CBOE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a net income of 385.70M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in a net margin of 30.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RMD and CBOE have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBOE has higher volatility (15.60%) compared to RMD (10.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMD dropped -61.61% vs CBOE's -43.23%.

CBOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMD and CBOE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer