RMBTX vs. HLMSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RMBTX (RMB International Fund) and HLMSX (Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, RMBTX returned 8.00%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for HLMSX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RMBTX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for HLMSX.

Performance

RMBTX vs. HLMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RMB International Fund (RMBTX) and Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMBTX achieves a 14.12% return, which is significantly higher than HLMSX's 7.05% return.

RMBTX

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 7.34%
• YTD: 14.12%
• 6M: 16.89%
• 1Y: 28.82%
• 3Y*: 16.00%
• 5Y*: 8.00%
• 10Y*: —

HLMSX

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 7.05%
• 6M: 9.40%
• 1Y: 7.54%
• 3Y*: 6.66%
• 5Y*: 0.39%
• 10Y*: 6.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMBTX vs. HLMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RMBTX RMB International Fund	14.12%	32.72%	0.01%	12.94%	-16.92%	9.52%	7.01%	19.21%	-24.23%
HLMSX Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio	7.05%	14.87%	-6.92%	11.78%	-24.50%	12.82%	18.51%	29.45%	-20.68%

Correlation

The correlation between RMBTX and HLMSX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2018	0.83

The correlation between RMBTX and HLMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RMBTX vs. HLMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMBTX

RMBTX Risk / Return Rank: 38
RMBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
RMBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
RMBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
RMBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
RMBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

HLMSX

HLMSX Risk / Return Rank: 7
HLMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
HLMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
HLMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
HLMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
HLMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMBTX vs. HLMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RMB International Fund (RMBTX) and Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RMBTX	HLMSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	0.58	+1.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	0.89	+1.58
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.11	+0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	0.67	+1.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.87	1.66	+7.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RMBTX vs. HLMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMBTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the HLMSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMBTX and HLMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RMBTX	HLMSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.80	0.58	+1.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.03	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.37	-0.07

Drawdowns

RMBTX vs. HLMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMBTX drawdown since its inception was -38.70%, smaller than the maximum HLMSX drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBTX and HLMSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RMBTX	HLMSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.70%	-60.77%	+22.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.95%	-10.59%	-1.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.45%	-16.57%	+2.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.68%	-38.22%	+9.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-8.62%	+8.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.81%	-13.22%	+3.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	4.25%	-1.09%

Volatility

RMBTX vs. HLMSX - Volatility Comparison

RMB International Fund (RMBTX) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) at 3.33%. This indicates that RMBTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RMBTX	HLMSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.23%	3.33%	+1.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.74%	9.66%	+3.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.66%	12.22%	+3.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.96%	15.04%	+0.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.98%	14.97%	+2.01%

RMBTX vs. HLMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMBTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HLMSX's 1.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

RMBTX vs. HLMSX - Dividend Comparison

RMBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than HLMSX's 3.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HLMSX Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio	3.77%	4.04%	1.17%	1.00%	1.83%	2.82%	0.03%	0.52%	7.56%	1.13%	4.37%	1.54%
RMBTX RMB International Fund	1.45%	1.66%	2.44%	2.03%	2.08%	1.03%	0.64%	1.17%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RMBTX and HLMSX in my portfolio?

RMBTX and HLMSX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RMBTX or HLMSX?

RMBTX has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to HLMSX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMBTX dropped -38.70% vs HLMSX's -60.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RMBTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.