PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMBTX vs. DFVQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMBTX vs. DFVQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RMB International Fund (RMBTX) and DFA International Vector Equity Portfolio (DFVQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMBTX achieves a 14.29% return, which is significantly higher than DFVQX's 11.02% return.


RMBTX

1D
0.72%
1M
2.13%
YTD
14.29%
6M
14.85%
1Y
31.40%
3Y*
15.01%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*

DFVQX

1D
0.20%
1M
0.20%
YTD
11.02%
6M
11.26%
1Y
29.85%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
10.95%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMBTX vs. DFVQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RMBTX
RMB International Fund
14.29%32.72%0.01%12.94%-16.92%9.52%7.01%19.21%-24.23%
DFVQX
DFA International Vector Equity Portfolio
11.02%38.02%4.55%17.05%-12.54%15.01%6.10%20.87%-22.02%

Correlation

The correlation between RMBTX and DFVQX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018

0.92

The correlation between RMBTX and DFVQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMBTX vs. DFVQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMBTX
RMBTX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
RMBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RMBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

DFVQX
DFVQX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DFVQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFVQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFVQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
DFVQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFVQX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMBTX vs. DFVQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RMB International Fund (RMBTX) and DFA International Vector Equity Portfolio (DFVQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMBTXDFVQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.38

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

2.68

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.54

10.31

-0.77

RMBTX vs. DFVQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMBTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the DFVQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMBTX and DFVQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMBTX vs. DFVQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMBTX drawdown since its inception was -38.70%, smaller than the maximum DFVQX drawdown of -44.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBTX and DFVQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMBTXDFVQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.70%

-44.58%

+5.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.95%

-10.98%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.45%

-13.00%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

-28.33%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.39%

+1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.76%

-7.83%

-1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

2.84%

+0.33%

Volatility

RMBTX vs. DFVQX - Volatility Comparison

RMB International Fund (RMBTX) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to DFA International Vector Equity Portfolio (DFVQX) at 4.52%. This indicates that RMBTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFVQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMBTXDFVQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

4.52%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.30%

11.61%

+1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.05%

13.99%

+2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

15.69%

+0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.00%

16.53%

+0.47%

RMBTX vs. DFVQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMBTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DFVQX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMBTX vs. DFVQX - Dividend Comparison

RMBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than DFVQX's 2.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFVQX
DFA International Vector Equity Portfolio
2.93%3.06%3.56%3.47%2.73%4.76%1.79%2.68%5.96%1.81%2.15%2.77%
RMBTX
RMB International Fund
1.45%1.66%2.44%2.03%2.08%1.03%0.64%1.17%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, RMBTX and DFVQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RMBTX has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to DFVQX (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMBTX dropped -38.70% vs DFVQX's -44.58%.

DFVQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMBTX and DFVQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer