RMBS vs. BBVA
RMBS (Rambus Inc.) and BBVA (Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.) are both stocks. RMBS operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while BBVA operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, RMBS returned 22.22%/yr vs 22.38%/yr for BBVA. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RMBS vs. BBVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMBS achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly lower than BBVA's 11.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RMBS having a 22.22% annualized return and BBVA not far ahead at 22.38%.
RMBS
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -28.56%
- 6M
- -6.61%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- 47.85%
- 3Y*
- 18.55%
- 5Y*
- 34.34%
- 10Y*
- 22.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.15%
BBVA
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- 6M
- 6.25%
- YTD
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 78.65%
- 3Y*
- 55.88%
- 5Y*
- 40.91%
- 10Y*
- 22.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.91%
RMBS vs. BBVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBS Rambus Inc. | 9.75% | 73.84% | -22.55% | 90.54% | 21.88% | 68.33% | 26.75% | 79.60% | -46.06% | 3.27% |
BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 11.13% | 153.74% | 14.20% | 62.48% | 10.09% | 22.05% | -6.31% | 11.07% | -35.01% | 32.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMBS and BBVA is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 1997 | 0.29 |
Fundamentals
RMBS:
$10.91B
BBVA:
$139.08B
RMBS:
$2.10
BBVA:
€1.84
RMBS:
48.00
BBVA:
11.97
RMBS:
0.10
BBVA:
0.44
RMBS:
15.31
BBVA:
2.75
RMBS:
7.94
BBVA:
2.21
RMBS:
$721.16M
BBVA:
€47.06B
RMBS:
$555.52M
BBVA:
€32.43B
RMBS:
$298.07M
BBVA:
€18.16B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMBS vs. BBVA — Risk / Return Rank
RMBS
BBVA
RMBS vs. BBVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rambus Inc. (RMBS) and Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. (BBVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMBS | BBVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.38 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 3.57 | -2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.73 | 9.40 | -6.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMBS vs. BBVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMBS drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than BBVA's maximum drawdown of -78.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBS and BBVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMBS | BBVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.16% | -78.31% | -18.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.91% | -22.14% | -18.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.83% | -22.14% | -26.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.83% | -42.28% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.95% | -69.63% | +16.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.91% | -3.90% | -37.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.74% | -29.01% | -45.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.56% | 8.39% | +9.17% |
Volatility
RMBS vs. BBVA - Volatility Comparison
Rambus Inc. (RMBS) has a higher volatility of 24.72% compared to Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. (BBVA) at 6.62%. This indicates that RMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMBS | BBVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.72% | 6.62% | +18.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.94% | 27.01% | +37.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.98% | 33.26% | +46.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.46% | 33.41% | +23.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.94% | 35.66% | +11.28% |
Dividends
RMBS vs. BBVA - Dividend Comparison
RMBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 4.31% | 3.51% | 7.71% | 5.51% | 6.29% | 2.79% | 3.50% | 5.23% | 5.75% | 5.17% | 6.02% | 4.29% |
RMBS Rambus Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RMBS vs. BBVA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rambus Inc. and Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RMBS vs. BBVA - Profitability Comparison
RMBS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a gross profit of 143.66M and revenue of 180.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.7%.
BBVA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. reported a gross profit of 8.83B and revenue of 10.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.9%.
RMBS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rambus Inc. reported an operating income of 61.76M and revenue of 180.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.3%.
BBVA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. reported an operating income of 4.72B and revenue of 10.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 44.3%.
RMBS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a net income of 59.86M and revenue of 180.19M, resulting in a net margin of 33.2%.
BBVA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. reported a net income of 2.99B and revenue of 10.65B, resulting in a net margin of 28.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RMBS and BBVA have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMBS has higher volatility (24.72%) compared to BBVA (6.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMBS dropped -97.16% vs BBVA's -78.31%.
BBVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RMBS and BBVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer