RMBMX vs. RMBPX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RMB SMID Cap Fund (RMBMX) and RMB Japan Fund (RMBPX).

RMBMX is managed by RMB Funds. It was launched on Dec 31, 2004. RMBPX is managed by RMB Funds. It was launched on Dec 26, 2017.

Performance

RMBMX vs. RMBPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RMB SMID Cap Fund (RMBMX) and RMB Japan Fund (RMBPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RMBMX vs. RMBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RMBMX RMB SMID Cap Fund	-1.13%	2.46%	10.04%	20.32%	-20.36%	28.05%	24.43%	31.74%	-8.65%
RMBPX RMB Japan Fund	0.00%	-0.24%	-14.03%	19.33%	-14.50%	-2.65%	13.06%	17.64%	-17.62%

Returns By Period

RMBMX

• 1D: 3.34%
• 1M: -6.66%
• YTD: -1.13%
• 6M: -2.63%
• 1Y: 5.29%
• 3Y*: 8.45%
• 5Y*: 4.37%
• 10Y*: 10.38%

RMBPX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMBMX vs. RMBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMBMX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than RMBPX's 1.30% expense ratio.

RMBPX

RMB Japan Fund

RMBMX

RMB SMID Cap Fund

Return for Risk

RMBMX vs. RMBPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMBMX

RMBMX Risk / Return Rank: 10
RMBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
RMBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
RMBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
RMBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
RMBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMBMX vs. RMBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RMB SMID Cap Fund (RMBMX) and RMB Japan Fund (RMBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RMBMX	RMBPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.27	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.55	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.43	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.62	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RMBMX	RMBPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between RMBMX and RMBPX is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RMBMX vs. RMBPX - Dividend Comparison

RMBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.96%, while RMBPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RMBMX RMB SMID Cap Fund	19.96%	19.73%	9.50%	10.12%	8.40%	5.53%	5.34%	14.27%	15.63%	14.74%	18.84%	6.38%
RMBPX RMB Japan Fund	0.00%	0.00%	3.28%	4.43%	1.04%	8.11%	0.29%	1.15%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RMBMX	RMBPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.76%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.97%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.59%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RMBMX	RMBPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.45%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.79%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.97%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.73%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.78%	—	—