RMBMX vs. FAMVX
RMBMX (RMB SMID Cap Fund) and FAMVX (FAM Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RMBMX returned 10.88%/yr vs 10.41%/yr for FAMVX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RMBMX charges 0.84%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for FAMVX.
Performance
RMBMX vs. FAMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMBMX achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly higher than FAMVX's 8.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RMBMX having a 10.88% annualized return and FAMVX not far behind at 10.41%.
RMBMX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- 6M
- 7.97%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 1Y
- 14.56%
- 3Y*
- 9.62%
- 5Y*
- 4.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.88%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.86%
FAMVX
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- YTD
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 12.03%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FAMVX FAM Value Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
RMBMX RMB SMID Cap Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
RMBMX vs. FAMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBMX RMB SMID Cap Fund | 10.82% | 2.46% | 10.04% | 20.32% | -20.36% | 28.05% | 24.43% | 31.74% | -5.04% | 13.65% |
FAMVX FAM Value Fund | 8.80% | 4.90% | 15.51% | 16.09% | -14.06% | 25.65% | 6.81% | 30.31% | -6.15% | 17.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMBMX and FAMVX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2004 | 0.91 |
The correlation between RMBMX and FAMVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMBMX vs. FAMVX — Risk / Return Rank
RMBMX
FAMVX
RMBMX vs. FAMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RMB SMID Cap Fund (RMBMX) and FAM Value Fund (FAMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMBMX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.13 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 1.02 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.13 | 3.10 | +1.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMBMX vs. FAMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMBMX drawdown since its inception was -52.47%, roughly equal to the maximum FAMVX drawdown of -51.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBMX and FAMVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMBMX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.47% | -51.12% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -9.47% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.10% | -16.74% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.03% | -22.77% | -6.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.63% | -37.73% | -1.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.73% | -1.00% | -1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -6.40% | -1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 3.11% | -0.19% |
Volatility
RMBMX vs. FAMVX - Volatility Comparison
RMB SMID Cap Fund (RMBMX) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to FAM Value Fund (FAMVX) at 3.48%. This indicates that RMBMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMBMX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 3.48% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 10.60% | +1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.22% | 13.94% | +2.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 17.13% | +3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 18.19% | +2.64% |
RMBMX vs. FAMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMBMX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than FAMVX's 1.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
RMBMX vs. FAMVX - Dividend Comparison
RMBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.81%, more than FAMVX's 4.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMVX FAM Value Fund | 4.51% | 4.90% | 6.28% | 5.01% | 3.67% | 4.99% | 3.69% | 6.80% | 4.09% | 5.06% | 5.21% | 9.06% |
RMBMX RMB SMID Cap Fund | 17.81% | 19.73% | 9.50% | 10.12% | 8.40% | 5.53% | 5.34% | 14.27% | 15.63% | 14.74% | 18.84% | 6.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RMBMX and FAMVX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMBMX has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to FAMVX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMBMX dropped -52.47% vs FAMVX's -51.12%.
RMBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RMBMX and FAMVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer