RMBPX vs. RMBHX
Compare and contrast key facts about RMB Japan Fund (RMBPX) and RMB Fund (RMBHX).
RMBPX is managed by RMB Funds. It was launched on Dec 26, 2017. RMBHX is managed by RMB Funds. It was launched on Jun 16, 1975.
Performance
RMBPX vs. RMBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMBPX vs. RMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBPX RMB Japan Fund | 0.00% | -0.24% | -14.03% | 19.33% | -14.50% | -2.65% | 13.06% | 17.64% | -17.62% |
RMBHX RMB Fund | -11.79% | 12.46% | 11.98% | 21.18% | -21.12% | 29.95% | 15.94% | 37.17% | -8.03% |
Returns By Period
RMBPX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RMBHX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -8.00%
- YTD
- -11.79%
- 6M
- -7.76%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.38%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMBPX vs. RMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMBPX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than RMBHX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMBPX vs. RMBHX — Risk / Return Rank
RMBPX
RMBHX
RMBPX vs. RMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RMB Japan Fund (RMBPX) and RMB Fund (RMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMBPX | RMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.26 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between RMBPX and RMBHX is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RMBPX vs. RMBHX - Dividend Comparison
RMBPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RMBHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.94%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBPX RMB Japan Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.28% | 4.43% | 1.04% | 8.11% | 0.29% | 1.15% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RMBHX RMB Fund | 10.94% | 9.65% | 6.53% | 1.49% | 9.70% | 5.97% | 4.83% | 1.65% | 9.98% | 34.90% | 36.98% | 9.82% |
Drawdowns
RMBPX vs. RMBHX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMBPX | RMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -70.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -13.79% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -25.09% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.68% | — |
Volatility
RMBPX vs. RMBHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMBPX | RMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 18.10% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 17.02% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 23.28% | — |