RMBMX vs. BARAX
RMBMX (RMB SMID Cap Fund) and BARAX (Baron Asset Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RMBMX returned 11.59%/yr vs 11.78%/yr for BARAX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RMBMX charges 0.84%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for BARAX.
Performance
RMBMX vs. BARAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMBMX achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly higher than BARAX's 4.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RMBMX having a 11.59% annualized return and BARAX not far ahead at 11.78%.
RMBMX
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 10.03%
- 1Y
- 16.21%
- 3Y*
- 13.16%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
BARAX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 10.48%
- YTD
- 4.38%
- 6M
- 3.28%
- 1Y
- 8.62%
- 3Y*
- 11.28%
- 5Y*
- 2.31%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
RMBMX vs. BARAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBMX RMB SMID Cap Fund | 12.51% | 2.46% | 10.04% | 20.32% | -20.36% | 28.05% | 24.43% | 31.74% | -5.04% | 13.65% |
BARAX Baron Asset Fund | 4.38% | 7.89% | 10.35% | 17.05% | -26.06% | 13.88% | 32.98% | 37.64% | -0.15% | 26.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMBMX and BARAX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2004 | 0.91 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RMBMX and BARAX has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMBMX vs. BARAX — Risk / Return Rank
RMBMX
BARAX
RMBMX vs. BARAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RMB SMID Cap Fund (RMBMX) and Baron Asset Fund (BARAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMBMX | BARAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.11 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 0.74 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.09 | 1.48 | +3.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMBMX vs. BARAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMBMX drawdown since its inception was -52.47%, smaller than the maximum BARAX drawdown of -59.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBMX and BARAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMBMX | BARAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.47% | -59.71% | +7.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -10.75% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.10% | -17.82% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.03% | -37.53% | +8.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.63% | -37.53% | -2.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -9.60% | +9.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.90% | -11.41% | +3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 5.33% | -2.38% |
Volatility
RMBMX vs. BARAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RMB SMID Cap Fund (RMBMX) is 4.92%, while Baron Asset Fund (BARAX) has a volatility of 13.52%. This indicates that RMBMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BARAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMBMX | BARAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 13.52% | -8.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.14% | 15.72% | -3.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.14% | 19.78% | -3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 20.33% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 20.17% | +0.67% |
RMBMX vs. BARAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMBMX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than BARAX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
RMBMX vs. BARAX - Dividend Comparison
RMBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.54%, more than BARAX's 11.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BARAX Baron Asset Fund | 11.02% | 11.51% | 19.23% | 3.48% | 0.01% | 7.65% | 3.05% | 1.78% | 7.42% | 7.25% | 4.88% | 11.50% |
RMBMX RMB SMID Cap Fund | 17.54% | 19.73% | 9.50% | 10.12% | 8.40% | 5.53% | 5.34% | 14.27% | 15.63% | 14.74% | 18.84% | 6.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RMBMX and BARAX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BARAX has higher volatility (13.52%) compared to RMBMX (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMBMX dropped -52.47% vs BARAX's -59.71%.
RMBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RMBMX and BARAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer