BARAX vs. BTU
BARAX (Baron Asset Fund) is Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Baron Capital Group, Inc., while BTU (Peabody Energy Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, BARAX returned 1.91%/yr vs 30.55%/yr for BTU. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BARAX vs. BTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BARAX achieves a -3.88% return, which is significantly lower than BTU's 1.93% return.
BARAX
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- -3.88%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- 0.55%
- 3Y*
- 8.21%
- 5Y*
- 1.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
BTU
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 13.90%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 6M
- 2.86%
- 1Y
- 132.08%
- 3Y*
- 18.57%
- 5Y*
- 30.55%
- 10Y*
- —
BARAX vs. BTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BARAX Baron Asset Fund | -3.88% | 7.89% | 10.35% | 17.05% | -26.06% | 13.88% | 32.98% | 37.64% | -0.15% | 15.11% |
BTU Peabody Energy Corporation | 1.93% | 44.18% | -12.80% | -7.03% | 162.36% | 317.84% | -73.57% | -67.32% | -21.62% | 27.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BARAX and BTU is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2017 | 0.17 |
The correlation between BARAX and BTU shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BARAX vs. BTU — Risk / Return Rank
BARAX
BTU
BARAX vs. BTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Asset Fund (BARAX) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BARAX | BTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.32 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.11 | 3.27 | -3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.23 | 7.92 | -7.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BARAX | BTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 | 2.24 | -2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.46 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.02 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
BARAX vs. BTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BARAX drawdown since its inception was -59.71%, smaller than the maximum BTU drawdown of -98.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BARAX and BTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BARAX | BTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.71% | -98.07% | +38.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.75% | -40.67% | +29.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.82% | -65.14% | +47.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.53% | -67.44% | +29.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.36% | -27.07% | +21.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.42% | -48.13% | +36.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | 16.74% | -11.54% |
Volatility
BARAX vs. BTU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baron Asset Fund (BARAX) is 3.28%, while Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a volatility of 18.95%. This indicates that BARAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BARAX | BTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 18.95% | -15.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.83% | 40.94% | -30.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.75% | 59.43% | -44.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 66.59% | -47.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 77.80% | -58.01% |
Dividends
BARAX vs. BTU - Dividend Comparison
BARAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.97%, more than BTU's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BARAX Baron Asset Fund | 11.97% | 11.51% | 19.23% | 3.48% | 0.01% | 7.65% | 3.05% | 1.78% | 7.42% | 7.25% | 4.88% | 11.50% |
BTU Peabody Energy Corporation | 1.00% | 1.01% | 1.43% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.43% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BARAX and BTU have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTU has higher volatility (18.95%) compared to BARAX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BARAX dropped -59.71% vs BTU's -98.07%.
BTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BARAX and BTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer