PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMBKX vs. LIVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMBKX vs. LIVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) and BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund (LIVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMBKX achieves a 13.40% return, which is significantly higher than LIVIX's 12.39% return. Over the past 10 years, RMBKX has underperformed LIVIX with an annualized return of 11.35%, while LIVIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.37% annualized return.


RMBKX

1D
0.58%
1M
4.93%
YTD
13.40%
6M
12.13%
1Y
36.49%
3Y*
24.13%
5Y*
8.03%
10Y*
11.35%

LIVIX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.71%
YTD
12.39%
6M
11.63%
1Y
28.07%
3Y*
19.49%
5Y*
10.28%
10Y*
12.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMBKX vs. LIVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMBKX
RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund
13.40%12.84%17.07%4.56%-19.18%56.40%-5.73%22.82%-17.13%12.17%
LIVIX
BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund
12.39%21.57%13.60%21.62%-18.38%18.75%14.99%26.76%-7.83%21.38%

Correlation

The correlation between RMBKX and LIVIX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.60

The correlation between RMBKX and LIVIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMBKX vs. LIVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMBKX
RMBKX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RMBKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMBKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMBKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RMBKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMBKX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

LIVIX
LIVIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LIVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
LIVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMBKX vs. LIVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) and BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund (LIVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMBKXLIVIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.40

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

3.11

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.26

13.47

-2.22

RMBKX vs. LIVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMBKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the LIVIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMBKX and LIVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMBKX vs. LIVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMBKX drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than LIVIX's maximum drawdown of -34.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBKX and LIVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMBKXLIVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-34.44%

-21.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-9.44%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.98%

-17.39%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.33%

-26.45%

-17.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.45%

-34.44%

-21.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-0.62%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.04%

-4.51%

-6.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

2.17%

+1.38%

Volatility

RMBKX vs. LIVIX - Volatility Comparison

RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) and BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund (LIVIX) have volatilities of 5.12% and 5.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMBKXLIVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

5.12%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.75%

11.01%

+2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.65%

13.29%

+7.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.78%

15.96%

+8.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.19%

16.76%

+10.43%

RMBKX vs. LIVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMBKX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than LIVIX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMBKX vs. LIVIX - Dividend Comparison

RMBKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, more than LIVIX's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LIVIX
BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund
2.21%2.48%0.01%2.04%1.96%2.04%1.56%2.95%2.35%2.27%1.54%2.88%
RMBKX
RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund
5.49%6.22%1.90%1.29%17.29%1.35%0.00%0.85%5.39%6.63%1.50%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMBKX and LIVIX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LIVIX has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to RMBKX (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMBKX dropped -55.45% vs LIVIX's -34.44%.

LIVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMBKX and LIVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer