PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMBHX vs. RMBMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMBHX vs. RMBMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RMB Fund (RMBHX) and RMB SMID Cap Fund (RMBMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMBHX achieves a 6.32% return, which is significantly lower than RMBMX's 10.82% return. Over the past 10 years, RMBHX has outperformed RMBMX with an annualized return of 12.47%, while RMBMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.88% annualized return.


RMBHX

1D
2.45%
1M
-0.11%
6M
6.77%
YTD
6.32%
1Y
16.47%
3Y*
12.20%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*
12.47%
ALL TIME*
5.86%

RMBMX

1D
0.51%
1M
-2.08%
6M
7.97%
YTD
10.82%
1Y
14.56%
3Y*
9.62%
5Y*
4.84%
10Y*
10.88%
ALL TIME*
8.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RMBHX vs. RMBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMBHX
RMB Fund
6.32%12.46%11.98%21.18%-21.12%29.95%15.94%37.17%-2.84%22.88%
RMBMX
RMB SMID Cap Fund
10.82%2.46%10.04%20.32%-20.36%28.05%24.43%31.74%-5.04%13.65%

Correlation

The correlation between RMBHX and RMBMX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2004

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between RMBHX and RMBMX has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMBHX vs. RMBMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RMBHX
RMBHX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
RMBHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMBHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMBHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
RMBHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMBHX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

RMBMX
RMBMX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
RMBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
RMBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RMBHX vs. RMBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RMB Fund (RMBHX) and RMB SMID Cap Fund (RMBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMBHXRMBMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.14

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

1.16

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.70

4.13

-0.43

RMBHX vs. RMBMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMBHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the RMBMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMBHX and RMBMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMBHX vs. RMBMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMBHX drawdown since its inception was -70.00%, which is greater than RMBMX's maximum drawdown of -52.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBHX and RMBMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMBHXRMBMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.00%

-52.47%

-17.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.93%

-10.40%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-24.10%

+5.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

-29.03%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.01%

-39.63%

+1.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-2.73%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.83%

-7.87%

-16.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

2.92%

+0.89%

Volatility

RMBHX vs. RMBMX - Volatility Comparison

RMB Fund (RMBHX) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to RMB SMID Cap Fund (RMBMX) at 3.72%. This indicates that RMBHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMBHXRMBMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

3.72%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.84%

12.02%

-1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.54%

16.22%

-2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

20.81%

-3.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.35%

20.83%

+2.52%

RMBHX vs. RMBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMBHX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than RMBMX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMBHX vs. RMBMX - Dividend Comparison

RMBHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.08%, less than RMBMX's 17.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RMBHX
RMB Fund
9.08%9.65%6.53%1.49%9.70%5.97%4.83%1.65%9.98%34.90%36.98%9.82%
RMBMX
RMB SMID Cap Fund
17.81%19.73%9.50%10.12%8.40%5.53%5.34%14.27%15.63%14.74%18.84%6.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMBHX and RMBMX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMBHX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to RMBMX (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMBHX dropped -70.00% vs RMBMX's -52.47%.

RMBHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMBHX and RMBMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer