RMAX.TO vs. NETL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RMAX.TO (Hamilton REITs YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) and NETL (NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. Over the past year, RMAX.TO returned 9.43% vs 14.39% for NETL. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RMAX.TO charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for NETL.

Performance

RMAX.TO vs. NETL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton REITs YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (RMAX.TO) and NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

RMAX.TO is traded in CAD, while NETL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NETL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMAX.TO achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly lower than NETL's 12.65% return.

RMAX.TO

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -0.46%
• YTD: 7.20%
• 6M: 7.28%
• 1Y: 9.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NETL

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 12.65%
• 6M: 10.27%
• 1Y: 14.39%
• 3Y*: 8.89%
• 5Y*: 4.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMAX.TO vs. NETL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RMAX.TO Hamilton REITs YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	7.20%	5.39%	9.70%
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF	12.65%	1.19%	9.94%

Correlation

The correlation between RMAX.TO and NETL is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2024	0.68

The correlation between RMAX.TO and NETL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

RMAX.TO vs. NETL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RMAX.TO	NETL
Real Estate	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RMAX.TO vs. NETL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMAX.TO

RMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 26
RMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
RMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
RMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 24
RMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
RMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 26

NETL

NETL Risk / Return Rank: 27
NETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
NETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
NETL Omega Ratio Rank: 25
NETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
NETL Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMAX.TO vs. NETL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton REITs YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (RMAX.TO) and NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RMAX.TO	NETL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	1.06	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	1.54	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.18	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	1.87	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.53	4.98	-1.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RMAX.TO vs. NETL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the NETL Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMAX.TO and NETL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RMAX.TO	NETL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	1.06	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.24	+0.66

Drawdowns

RMAX.TO vs. NETL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.90%, smaller than the maximum NETL drawdown of -46.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMAX.TO and NETL.

Drawdown Indicators

	RMAX.TO	NETL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.90%	-46.71%	+30.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.43%	-7.72%	+1.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.28%	-2.04%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.71%	-9.41%	+5.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	2.90%	-0.22%

Volatility

RMAX.TO vs. NETL - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton REITs YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (RMAX.TO) and NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) have volatilities of 3.36% and 3.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RMAX.TO	NETL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.36%	3.22%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.23%	9.81%	-1.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.86%	13.60%	-2.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.98%	16.40%	-3.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.98%	23.86%	-10.88%

RMAX.TO vs. NETL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMAX.TO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NETL's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

RMAX.TO vs. NETL - Dividend Comparison

RMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.64%, more than NETL's 4.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF	4.80%	5.12%	5.08%	4.57%	4.47%	4.03%	3.98%	2.52%
RMAX.TO Hamilton REITs YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	10.64%	10.65%	4.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RMAX.TO and NETL in my portfolio?

RMAX.TO and NETL have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RMAX.TO or NETL?

On fees, NETL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RMAX.TO or NETL?

NETL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for RMAX.TO.

What is the main difference between RMAX.TO and NETL?

They also come from different issuers: Hamilton ETFs and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for RMAX.TO and 0.60% for NETL.