PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RLY vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RLY vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLY achieves a 15.03% return, which is significantly higher than VXUS's 13.69% return. Over the past 10 years, RLY has underperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 8.43%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.22% annualized return.


RLY

1D
0.47%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
15.03%
6M
15.93%
1Y
27.41%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
8.43%

VXUS

1D
0.40%
1M
0.71%
YTD
13.69%
6M
15.52%
1Y
28.39%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLY vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RLY
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
15.03%20.26%2.53%2.56%7.86%22.85%-0.59%15.63%-11.72%10.40%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
13.69%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%27.46%

Correlation

The correlation between RLY and VXUS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between RLY and VXUS has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RLY vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RLY
VXUS

Energy

30.1%
5.2%

Basic Materials

25.1%
7.6%

Industrials

16.5%
16.1%

Utilities

15.9%
3.2%

Real Estate

5.4%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

2.6%
8.4%

Healthcare

0.8%
7.1%

Financial Services

0.0%
22.3%

Communication Services

-

4.4%

Technology

-

18.1%

Energy

RLY
30.1%
VXUS
5.2%

Basic Materials

RLY
25.1%
VXUS
7.6%

Industrials

RLY
16.5%
VXUS
16.1%

Utilities

RLY
15.9%
VXUS
3.2%

Real Estate

RLY
5.4%
VXUS
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

RLY
3.6%
VXUS
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

RLY
2.6%
VXUS
8.4%

Healthcare

RLY
0.8%
VXUS
7.1%

Financial Services

RLY
0.0%
VXUS
22.3%

Communication Services

RLY

-

VXUS
4.4%

Technology

RLY

-

VXUS
18.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RLY vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLY
RLY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLY vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RLYVXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.33

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.95

2.53

+3.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.94

9.72

+13.21

RLY vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLY Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLY and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RLY vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLY drawdown since its inception was -37.75%, roughly equal to the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLY and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLYVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.75%

-35.97%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.63%

-11.27%

+6.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

-13.58%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.94%

-29.44%

+10.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.17%

-35.97%

+1.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-1.47%

-1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.44%

-8.21%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

2.93%

-1.73%

Volatility

RLY vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) is 3.25%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that RLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLYVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

6.71%

-3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.47%

14.02%

-5.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

16.09%

-5.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

16.21%

-2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.82%

17.20%

-3.38%

RLY vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RLY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

RLY vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

RLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than VXUS's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RLY
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
2.92%3.24%3.31%3.71%5.66%12.15%2.16%3.45%2.76%1.85%2.07%1.80%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.67%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


RLY and VXUS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXUS has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to RLY (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLY dropped -37.75% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

On 10-year performance, VXUS leads with 10.22% vs 8.43% for RLY. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, RLY has been the lower-risk option at 3.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 10.22% return vs 8.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RLY.

RLY has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 2.67% for VXUS.

RLY is categorized as Hedge Fund, while VXUS is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RLY and 0.05% for VXUS.

RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RLY and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer