RLY vs. JAAA
RLY (SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF) and JAAA (Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RLY is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by State Street, while JAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by Janus Henderson. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RLY returned 9.85%/yr vs 4.80%/yr for JAAA. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RLY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for JAAA.
Performance
RLY vs. JAAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RLY achieves a 14.36% return, which is significantly higher than JAAA's 1.95% return.
RLY
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- 14.36%
- 6M
- 16.24%
- 1Y
- 28.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.25%
JAAA
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 5.12%
- 3Y*
- 6.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.80%
- 10Y*
- —
RLY vs. JAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 14.36% | 20.26% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 7.86% | 22.85% | 12.82% |
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF | 1.95% | 5.16% | 7.43% | 8.59% | 0.49% | 1.39% | 0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between RLY and JAAA is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2020 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RLY vs. JAAA — Risk / Return Rank
RLY
JAAA
RLY vs. JAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RLY | JAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 2.77 | -1.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.16 | 13.24 | -6.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.86 | 71.21 | -45.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RLY | JAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 6.15 | -3.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 2.88 | -2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 2.78 | -2.42 |
Drawdowns
RLY vs. JAAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLY drawdown since its inception was -37.75%, which is greater than JAAA's maximum drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLY and JAAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RLY | JAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.75% | -2.64% | -35.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.93% | -0.39% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.08% | -1.46% | -8.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.94% | -2.64% | -16.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.93% | 0.00% | -3.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -0.25% | -9.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 0.07% | +1.02% |
Volatility
RLY vs. JAAA - Volatility Comparison
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) at 0.13%. This indicates that RLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RLY | JAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 0.13% | +3.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.46% | 0.64% | +7.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 0.84% | +9.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 1.68% | +11.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 1.64% | +12.19% |
RLY vs. JAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RLY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JAAA's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
RLY vs. JAAA - Dividend Comparison
RLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than JAAA's 4.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF | 4.99% | 5.30% | 6.35% | 6.11% | 2.74% | 1.21% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 2.93% | 3.24% | 3.31% | 3.71% | 5.66% | 12.15% | 2.16% | 3.45% | 2.76% | 1.85% | 2.07% | 1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RLY and JAAA have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RLY has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to JAAA (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLY dropped -37.75% vs JAAA's -2.64%.
On 5-year performance, RLY leads with 9.85% vs 4.80% for JAAA. On fees, JAAA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, JAAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RLY has performed better with a 9.85% return vs 4.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JAAA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RLY.
JAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 2.93% for RLY.
RLY is categorized as Hedge Fund, while JAAA is CLO. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RLY and 0.20% for JAAA.
JAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.15 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RLY and JAAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer