RLY vs. GBTC
RLY (SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF) and GBTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RLY is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by State Street, while GBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark Rate Index. RLY is actively managed, while GBTC is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RLY returned 8.25%/yr vs 49.25%/yr for GBTC. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RLY charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for GBTC.
Performance
RLY vs. GBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RLY achieves a 14.36% return, which is significantly higher than GBTC's -28.07% return. Over the past 10 years, RLY has underperformed GBTC with an annualized return of 8.25%, while GBTC has yielded a comparatively higher 49.25% annualized return.
RLY
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- 14.36%
- 6M
- 16.24%
- 1Y
- 28.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.25%
GBTC
- 1D
- 5.06%
- 1M
- -21.09%
- YTD
- -28.07%
- 6M
- -30.74%
- 1Y
- -40.20%
- 3Y*
- 53.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.31%
- 10Y*
- 49.25%
RLY vs. GBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 14.36% | 20.26% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 7.86% | 22.85% | -0.59% | 15.63% | -11.72% | 10.40% |
GBTC Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF | -28.07% | -7.65% | 113.81% | 317.61% | -75.80% | 7.03% | 290.72% | 106.56% | -82.10% | 1,787.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between RLY and GBTC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2015 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RLY vs. GBTC — Risk / Return Rank
RLY
GBTC
RLY vs. GBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RLY | GBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 0.86 | +0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.16 | -0.77 | +7.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.86 | -1.38 | +27.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RLY | GBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | -0.91 | +3.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.17 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.65 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
RLY vs. GBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLY drawdown since its inception was -37.75%, smaller than the maximum GBTC drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLY and GBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RLY | GBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.75% | -89.91% | +52.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.93% | -52.45% | +48.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.08% | -52.45% | +42.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.94% | -85.42% | +66.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.17% | -89.91% | +55.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.93% | -50.05% | +46.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -43.44% | +33.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 29.16% | -28.07% |
Volatility
RLY vs. GBTC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) is 3.47%, while Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) has a volatility of 11.75%. This indicates that RLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RLY | GBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 11.75% | -8.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.46% | 34.55% | -26.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 44.19% | -33.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 62.40% | -48.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 82.22% | -68.39% |
RLY vs. GBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RLY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GBTC's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
RLY vs. GBTC - Dividend Comparison
RLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, while GBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBTC Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 2.93% | 3.24% | 3.31% | 3.71% | 5.66% | 12.15% | 2.16% | 3.45% | 2.76% | 1.85% | 2.07% | 1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RLY and GBTC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GBTC has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to RLY (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLY dropped -37.75% vs GBTC's -89.91%.
On 10-year performance, GBTC leads with 49.25% vs 8.25% for RLY. On fees, RLY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RLY has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GBTC has performed better with a 49.25% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RLY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GBTC.
RLY has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 0.00% for GBTC.
RLY is categorized as Hedge Fund, while GBTC is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RLY and 1.50% for GBTC.
RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RLY and GBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer