PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RLY vs. CDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RLY vs. CDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLY achieves a 15.03% return, which is significantly higher than CDX's -1.56% return.


RLY

1D
0.47%
1M
-2.69%
YTD
15.03%
6M
15.93%
1Y
26.61%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
8.43%

CDX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.33%
YTD
-1.56%
6M
-1.47%
1Y
-0.54%
3Y*
7.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLY vs. CDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RLY
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
15.03%20.26%2.53%2.56%2.29%
CDX
Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF
-1.56%9.51%7.71%12.74%-8.26%

Correlation

The correlation between RLY and CDX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022

0.23

The correlation between RLY and CDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RLY vs. CDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLY
RLY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

CDX
CDX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
CDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
CDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLY vs. CDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RLYCDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

0.98

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.95

-0.17

+6.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.94

-0.39

+23.32

RLY vs. CDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLY Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the CDX Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLY and CDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RLY vs. CDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLY drawdown since its inception was -37.75%, which is greater than CDX's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLY and CDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLYCDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.75%

-13.24%

-24.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.63%

-4.18%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

-8.88%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-6.57%

+3.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.44%

-4.35%

-5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

1.85%

-0.65%

Volatility

RLY vs. CDX - Volatility Comparison

SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX) at 1.73%. This indicates that RLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLYCDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

1.73%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.47%

4.81%

+3.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

5.80%

+4.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

11.08%

+2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.82%

11.08%

+2.74%

RLY vs. CDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RLY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CDX's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

RLY vs. CDX - Dividend Comparison

RLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, less than CDX's 8.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDX
Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF
8.29%7.18%12.60%5.26%7.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RLY
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
2.92%3.24%3.31%3.71%5.66%12.15%2.16%3.45%2.76%1.85%2.07%1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


RLY and CDX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RLY has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to CDX (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLY dropped -37.75% vs CDX's -13.24%.

On 3-year performance, RLY leads with 13.98% vs 7.84% for CDX. On fees, CDX is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, CDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, RLY has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 7.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CDX is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RLY.

CDX has the higher dividend yield at 8.29%, compared with 2.92% for RLY.

RLY is categorized as Hedge Fund, while CDX is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RLY and 0.26% for CDX.

RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RLY and CDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer