PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RLY vs. ASET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RLY vs. ASET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RLY

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
17.13%
6M
18.27%
1Y
31.78%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*
8.56%

ASET

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLY vs. ASET - Yearly Performance Comparison


RLY vs. ASET - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RLY
ASET

Energy

30.1%
7.8%

Basic Materials

25.1%
5.8%

Industrials

16.5%
16.3%

Utilities

15.9%
12.8%

Real Estate

5.4%
41.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

2.6%
0.1%

Healthcare

0.8%
2.2%

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Communication Services

-

12.1%

Technology

-

0.2%

Energy

RLY
30.1%
ASET
7.8%

Basic Materials

RLY
25.1%
ASET
5.8%

Industrials

RLY
16.5%
ASET
16.3%

Utilities

RLY
15.9%
ASET
12.8%

Real Estate

RLY
5.4%
ASET
41.6%

Consumer Defensive

RLY
3.6%
ASET
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

RLY
2.6%
ASET
0.1%

Healthcare

RLY
0.8%
ASET
2.2%

Financial Services

RLY
0.0%
ASET

-

Communication Services

RLY

-

ASET
12.1%

Technology

RLY

-

ASET
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RLY vs. ASET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLY
RLY Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ASET
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLY vs. ASET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RLYASETDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

31.17

RLY vs. ASET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RLYASETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

Drawdowns

RLY vs. ASET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLY drawdown since its inception was -37.75%, which is greater than ASET's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLY and ASET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLYASETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.75%

0.00%

-37.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

0.00%

-1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.46%

0.00%

-9.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

Volatility

RLY vs. ASET - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLYASETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.06%

0.00%

+10.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.54%

0.00%

+13.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.81%

0.00%

+13.81%

RLY vs. ASET - Expense Ratio Comparison

RLY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ASET's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

RLY vs. ASET - Dividend Comparison

RLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, while ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASET
FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RLY
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
2.86%3.24%3.31%3.71%5.66%12.15%2.16%3.45%2.76%1.85%2.07%1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, RLY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RLY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ASET.

RLY has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

RLY is categorized as Hedge Fund, while ASET is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RLY and 0.57% for ASET.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RLY and ASET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer