RLY vs. ASET
RLY (SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF) and ASET (FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RLY is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by State Street, while ASET is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return. RLY is actively managed, while ASET is passively managed. RLY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for ASET.
Performance
RLY vs. ASET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RLY
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 17.13%
- 6M
- 18.27%
- 1Y
- 31.78%
- 3Y*
- 15.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
ASET
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RLY vs. ASET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 7.23% |
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund | 0.00% |
RLY vs. ASET - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RLY
ASET
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Energy
RLY
ASET
Basic Materials
RLY
ASET
Industrials
RLY
ASET
Utilities
RLY
ASET
Real Estate
RLY
ASET
Consumer Defensive
RLY
ASET
Consumer Cyclical
RLY
ASET
Healthcare
RLY
ASET
Financial Services
RLY
ASET
-
Communication Services
RLY
-
ASET
Technology
RLY
-
ASET
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RLY vs. ASET — Risk / Return Rank
RLY
ASET
RLY vs. ASET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RLY | ASET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.17 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.33 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.60 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.17 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RLY | ASET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | — | — |
Drawdowns
RLY vs. ASET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLY drawdown since its inception was -37.75%, which is greater than ASET's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLY and ASET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RLY | ASET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.75% | 0.00% | -37.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | 0.00% | -1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.46% | 0.00% | -9.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | — | — |
Volatility
RLY vs. ASET - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RLY | ASET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.06% | 0.00% | +10.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.54% | 0.00% | +13.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 0.00% | +13.81% |
RLY vs. ASET - Expense Ratio Comparison
RLY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ASET's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
RLY vs. ASET - Dividend Comparison
RLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, while ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 2.86% | 3.24% | 3.31% | 3.71% | 5.66% | 12.15% | 2.16% | 3.45% | 2.76% | 1.85% | 2.07% | 1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, RLY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RLY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ASET.
RLY has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.
RLY is categorized as Hedge Fund, while ASET is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RLY and 0.57% for ASET.
Find the right allocation for RLY and ASET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer