RLVSX vs. DCARX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

RLVSX (Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund) and DCARX (DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, RLVSX returned 1.24%/yr vs 2.49%/yr for DCARX. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RLVSX charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for DCARX.

Performance

RLVSX vs. DCARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (RLVSX) and DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio (DCARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RLVSX having a 1.72% return and DCARX slightly higher at 1.75%.

RLVSX

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 6M: 1.81%
• 1Y: 5.81%
• 3Y*: 3.72%
• 5Y*: 1.24%
• 10Y*: 2.16%

DCARX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: 1.75%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 2.99%
• 3Y*: 3.05%
• 5Y*: 2.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLVSX vs. DCARX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RLVSX Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund	1.72%	4.26%	1.76%	6.11%	-7.58%	2.03%	4.05%	7.38%	1.45%	0.86%
DCARX DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio	1.75%	2.64%	3.16%	2.63%	-1.06%	6.21%	2.35%	5.08%	-0.46%	1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between RLVSX and DCARX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2017	0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between RLVSX and DCARX has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

RLVSX vs. DCARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLVSX

RLVSX Risk / Return Rank: 80
RLVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RLVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
RLVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
RLVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
RLVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

DCARX

DCARX Risk / Return Rank: 94
DCARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
DCARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
DCARX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
DCARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
DCARX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLVSX vs. DCARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (RLVSX) and DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio (DCARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RLVSX	DCARX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.28	2.73	+0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.88	4.48	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.90	1.74	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	6.22	-3.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.49	16.53	-7.04

RLVSX vs. DCARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLVSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is comparable to the DCARX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLVSX and DCARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RLVSX vs. DCARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLVSX drawdown since its inception was -11.77%, roughly equal to the maximum DCARX drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLVSX and DCARX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RLVSX	DCARX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.77%	-12.27%	+0.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.17%	-0.47%	-1.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.22%	-1.39%	-2.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.77%	-4.79%	-6.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-11.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-0.47%	+0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-0.74%	-0.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.61%	0.18%	+0.43%

Volatility

RLVSX vs. DCARX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (RLVSX) has a higher volatility of 0.53% compared to DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio (DCARX) at 0.36%. This indicates that RLVSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DCARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RLVSX	DCARX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.53%	0.36%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.40%	0.89%	+0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78%	1.06%	+0.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.10%	2.24%	+0.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.33%	2.90%	+0.43%

RLVSX vs. DCARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RLVSX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than DCARX's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

RLVSX vs. DCARX - Dividend Comparison

RLVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than DCARX's 3.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DCARX DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio	3.23%	3.11%	3.52%	1.84%	0.90%	0.78%	1.12%	1.43%	1.27%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%
RLVSX Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund	3.51%	3.18%	3.57%	3.20%	2.73%	2.06%	2.58%	3.08%	2.89%	2.65%	2.64%	2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RLVSX and DCARX in my portfolio?

RLVSX and DCARX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RLVSX or DCARX?

RLVSX has higher volatility (0.53%) compared to DCARX (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLVSX dropped -11.77% vs DCARX's -12.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RLVSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.