RLSIX vs. WTLS
RLSIX (RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund) and WTLS (WisdomTree Efficient Long/Short US Equity Fund) are both Long-Short funds. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RLSIX charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for WTLS.
Performance
RLSIX vs. WTLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RLSIX
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 6M
- -0.90%
- 1Y
- 8.70%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- -3.49%
- 10Y*
- 6.66%
WTLS
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 9.55%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RLSIX vs. WTLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RLSIX RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund | 0.79% |
WTLS WisdomTree Efficient Long/Short US Equity Fund | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between RLSIX and WTLS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RLSIX vs. WTLS — Risk / Return Rank
RLSIX
WTLS
RLSIX vs. WTLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX) and WisdomTree Efficient Long/Short US Equity Fund (WTLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RLSIX | WTLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.84 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RLSIX | WTLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 4.00 | -3.62 |
Drawdowns
RLSIX vs. WTLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLSIX drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, which is greater than WTLS's maximum drawdown of -8.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLSIX and WTLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RLSIX | WTLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.82% | -8.94% | -51.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.28% | 0.00% | -26.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.08% | -1.79% | -13.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | — | — |
Volatility
RLSIX vs. WTLS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RLSIX | WTLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.58% | 18.45% | -6.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.94% | 18.45% | +6.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 18.45% | +3.09% |
RLSIX vs. WTLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RLSIX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than WTLS's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
RLSIX vs. WTLS - Dividend Comparison
Neither RLSIX nor WTLS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLSIX RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.94% | 11.66% | 1.26% |
WTLS WisdomTree Efficient Long/Short US Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RLSIX and WTLS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for RLSIX and WTLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer