PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RLIIX vs. JCRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RLIIX vs. JCRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverFront Asset Allocation Growth & Income (RLIIX) and ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund (JCRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLIIX achieves a 8.09% return, which is significantly lower than JCRAX's 18.77% return. Over the past 10 years, RLIIX has underperformed JCRAX with an annualized return of 6.90%, while JCRAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.27% annualized return.


RLIIX

1D
1.02%
1M
0.25%
6M
5.46%
YTD
8.09%
1Y
16.89%
3Y*
11.32%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
6.90%
ALL TIME*
6.28%

JCRAX

1D
0.73%
1M
5.83%
6M
7.37%
YTD
18.77%
1Y
38.22%
3Y*
12.73%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
8.27%
ALL TIME*
3.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RLIIX vs. JCRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RLIIX
RiverFront Asset Allocation Growth & Income
8.09%13.74%8.77%13.37%-14.99%13.57%7.10%18.51%-11.07%15.00%
JCRAX
ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund
18.77%25.30%1.32%-7.37%12.82%29.21%2.15%11.00%-14.54%4.58%

Correlation

The correlation between RLIIX and JCRAX is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between RLIIX and JCRAX has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RLIIX vs. JCRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RLIIX
RLIIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
RLIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
RLIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

JCRAX
JCRAX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
JCRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
JCRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RLIIX vs. JCRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Asset Allocation Growth & Income (RLIIX) and ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund (JCRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RLIIXJCRAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.40

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.72

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.67

9.01

+1.65

RLIIX vs. JCRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the JCRAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLIIX and JCRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RLIIX vs. JCRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLIIX drawdown since its inception was -27.35%, smaller than the maximum JCRAX drawdown of -62.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLIIX and JCRAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLIIXJCRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.35%

-62.03%

+34.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.43%

-13.01%

+6.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.90%

-13.01%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.19%

-26.60%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.35%

-43.14%

+15.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-7.32%

+7.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.56%

-26.21%

+21.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

3.92%

-2.42%

Volatility

RLIIX vs. JCRAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverFront Asset Allocation Growth & Income (RLIIX) is 2.07%, while ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund (JCRAX) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that RLIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JCRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLIIXJCRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.07%

4.07%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.17%

11.68%

-4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.04%

14.83%

-5.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.83%

20.67%

-9.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.94%

18.08%

-6.14%

RLIIX vs. JCRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RLIIX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JCRAX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

RLIIX vs. JCRAX - Dividend Comparison

RLIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, less than JCRAX's 7.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JCRAX
ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund
7.41%8.80%2.80%3.29%7.08%22.43%0.29%0.90%3.26%2.44%0.05%0.00%
RLIIX
RiverFront Asset Allocation Growth & Income
5.76%6.23%1.29%2.29%6.66%1.40%1.42%2.07%18.88%1.37%1.66%3.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


RLIIX and JCRAX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JCRAX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to RLIIX (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLIIX dropped -27.35% vs JCRAX's -62.03%.

JCRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RLIIX and JCRAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer