PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JCRAX vs. ALIBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JCRAX vs. ALIBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund (JCRAX) and ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity Fund (ALIBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCRAX achieves a 15.56% return, which is significantly higher than ALIBX's 8.47% return.


JCRAX

1D
-1.16%
1M
-7.33%
YTD
15.56%
6M
15.70%
1Y
30.19%
3Y*
13.08%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*
7.42%

ALIBX

1D
0.66%
1M
1.63%
YTD
8.47%
6M
8.35%
1Y
21.86%
3Y*
14.26%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCRAX vs. ALIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JCRAX
ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund
15.56%25.30%1.32%-7.37%12.82%29.21%17.27%
ALIBX
ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity Fund
8.47%12.89%14.89%16.01%-16.24%15.50%8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between JCRAX and ALIBX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2020

0.36

The correlation between JCRAX and ALIBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JCRAX vs. ALIBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCRAX
JCRAX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
JCRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
JCRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

ALIBX
ALIBX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ALIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ALIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCRAX vs. ALIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund (JCRAX) and ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity Fund (ALIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JCRAXALIBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.42

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

3.04

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.96

13.71

-0.75

JCRAX vs. ALIBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCRAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the ALIBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCRAX and ALIBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JCRAX vs. ALIBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCRAX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than ALIBX's maximum drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCRAX and ALIBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JCRAXALIBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.03%

-20.38%

-41.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-7.13%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.86%

-12.65%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.60%

-20.38%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.83%

-0.37%

-9.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.33%

-4.72%

-21.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

1.57%

+0.73%

Volatility

JCRAX vs. ALIBX - Volatility Comparison

ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund (JCRAX) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity Fund (ALIBX) at 3.53%. This indicates that JCRAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JCRAXALIBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

3.53%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.80%

7.58%

+4.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.48%

9.32%

+5.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.66%

11.24%

+9.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

11.04%

+7.07%

JCRAX vs. ALIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCRAX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than ALIBX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

JCRAX vs. ALIBX - Dividend Comparison

JCRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.62%, less than ALIBX's 8.39% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ALIBX
ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity Fund
8.39%9.14%10.61%1.37%1.08%0.56%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JCRAX
ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund
7.62%8.80%2.80%3.29%7.08%22.43%0.29%0.90%3.26%2.44%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


JCRAX and ALIBX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JCRAX has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to ALIBX (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCRAX dropped -62.03% vs ALIBX's -20.38%.

ALIBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JCRAX and ALIBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer