RL vs. PRDO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

RL (Ralph Lauren Corporation) and PRDO (Perdoceo Education Corporation) are both stocks. RL operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical), while PRDO operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, RL returned 18.35%/yr vs 20.32%/yr for PRDO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RL vs. PRDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RL achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly lower than PRDO's 17.13% return. Over the past 10 years, RL has underperformed PRDO with an annualized return of 18.35%, while PRDO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.32% annualized return.

RL

• 1D: 2.72%
• 1M: 21.82%
• YTD: 14.56%
• 6M: 9.70%
• 1Y: 52.96%
• 3Y*: 52.12%
• 5Y*: 29.57%
• 10Y*: 18.35%

PRDO

• 1D: -3.60%
• 1M: -2.07%
• YTD: 17.13%
• 6M: 18.99%
• 1Y: 8.84%
• 3Y*: 42.27%
• 5Y*: 23.24%
• 10Y*: 20.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RL vs. PRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RL Ralph Lauren Corporation	14.56%	55.03%	62.85%	39.82%	-8.41%	16.66%	-10.63%	16.07%	1.82%	17.53%
PRDO Perdoceo Education Corporation	17.13%	12.94%	54.04%	27.99%	18.20%	-6.89%	-31.32%	61.03%	-5.46%	19.72%

Correlation

The correlation between RL and PRDO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 1998	0.25

The correlation between RL and PRDO shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap RL : $25.17B PRDO : $2.16B
EPS RL : $15.08 PRDO : $2.61
PE Ratio RL : 26.79 PRDO : 13.07
PEG Ratio RL : 1.49 PRDO : 0.90
PS Ratio RL : 3.11 PRDO : 2.60
PB Ratio RL : 8.86 PRDO : 2.16
Total Revenue (TTM) RL : $8.11B PRDO : $854.84M
Gross Profit (TTM) RL : $5.67B PRDO : $442.47M
EBITDA (TTM) RL : $1.18B PRDO : $269.29M

Return for Risk

RL vs. PRDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RL

RL Risk / Return Rank: 83
RL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
RL Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
RL Omega Ratio Rank: 78
RL Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
RL Martin Ratio Rank: 88

PRDO

PRDO Risk / Return Rank: 50
PRDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PRDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
PRDO Omega Ratio Rank: 47
PRDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
PRDO Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RL vs. PRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RL	PRDO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	0.29	+1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	0.59	+1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.08	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	0.33	+2.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.65	0.72	+8.94

RL vs. PRDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RL Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the PRDO Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RL and PRDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RL vs. PRDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RL drawdown since its inception was -68.62%, smaller than the maximum PRDO drawdown of -97.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RL and PRDO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RL	PRDO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.62%	-97.10%	+28.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.67%	-27.22%	+9.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.18%	-27.22%	-8.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.51%	-27.42%	-9.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.14%	-64.27%	+9.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-48.70%	+48.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.11%	-60.36%	+36.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.50%	12.35%	-6.85%

Volatility

RL vs. PRDO - Volatility Comparison

Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) has a higher volatility of 16.13% compared to Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) at 8.06%. This indicates that RL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RL	PRDO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.13%	8.06%	+8.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.42%	21.38%	+6.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.57%	30.80%	+3.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.11%	35.19%	+1.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.73%	38.11%	+0.62%

Dividends

RL vs. PRDO - Dividend Comparison

RL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than PRDO's 1.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRDO Perdoceo Education Corporation	1.76%	1.91%	1.81%	1.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RL Ralph Lauren Corporation	0.90%	1.01%	1.40%	2.08%	2.78%	1.74%	0.66%	2.29%	2.30%	1.93%	2.21%	1.79%

Financials

RL vs. PRDO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ralph Lauren Corporation and Perdoceo Education Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ralph Lauren Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.38B and revenue of 1.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.7%.

PRDO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perdoceo Education Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 221.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ralph Lauren Corporation reported an operating income of 156.80M and revenue of 1.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

PRDO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perdoceo Education Corporation reported an operating income of 63.12M and revenue of 221.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.5%.

RL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ralph Lauren Corporation reported a net income of 151.60M and revenue of 1.98B, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.

PRDO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perdoceo Education Corporation reported a net income of 53.95M and revenue of 221.74M, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RL and PRDO in my portfolio?

RL and PRDO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RL or PRDO?

RL has higher volatility (16.13%) compared to PRDO (8.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RL dropped -68.62% vs PRDO's -97.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.