PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RKTL vs. QTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RKTL vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKT ETF (RKTL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RKTL

1D
4.20%
1M
-17.90%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTAP

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.33%
YTD
14.58%
6M
15.43%
1Y
25.33%
3Y*
21.09%
5Y*
13.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RKTL vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RKTL and QTAP is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RKTL vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RKTL

QTAP
QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RKTL vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKT ETF (RKTL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RKTL vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RKTLQTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.77

0.75

-1.52

Drawdowns

RKTL vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RKTL drawdown since its inception was -77.06%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKTL and QTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RKTLQTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.06%

-29.44%

-47.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.54%

-0.18%

-75.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.71%

-5.03%

-50.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.32%

Volatility

RKTL vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RKTLQTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

126.92%

5.56%

+121.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

126.92%

18.88%

+108.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

126.92%

18.77%

+108.15%

RKTL vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RKTL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

RKTL vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither RKTL nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


RKTL and QTAP have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for RKTL.

RKTL and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for RKTL and 0.79% for QTAP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RKTL and QTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer