RKT vs. SCYB
RKT (Rocket Companies, Inc.) is a stock, while SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) is High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Over the past year, RKT returned -3.29% vs 6.85% for SCYB. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
RKT vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RKT achieves a -36.21% return, which is significantly lower than SCYB's 1.37% return.
RKT
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- -21.29%
- YTD
- -36.21%
- 6M
- -34.34%
- 1Y
- -3.29%
- 3Y*
- 13.40%
- 5Y*
- -8.35%
- 10Y*
- —
SCYB
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 6.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RKT vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RKT Rocket Companies, Inc. | -36.21% | 81.69% | -22.24% | 44.22% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 1.37% | 8.33% | 8.15% | 6.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between RKT and SCYB is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023 | 0.52 |
The correlation between RKT and SCYB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RKT vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank
RKT
SCYB
RKT vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RKT | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.36 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 2.82 | -2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.15 | 12.57 | -12.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RKT | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 | 1.83 | -1.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 1.67 | -1.76 |
Drawdowns
RKT vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RKT drawdown since its inception was -83.00%, which is greater than SCYB's maximum drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKT and SCYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RKT | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.00% | -4.92% | -78.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.31% | -2.44% | -44.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.67% | -0.50% | -64.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.17% | -0.52% | -59.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.62% | 0.55% | +22.07% |
Volatility
RKT vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison
Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) has a higher volatility of 20.75% compared to Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) at 1.03%. This indicates that RKT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RKT | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.75% | 1.03% | +19.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.53% | 2.97% | +39.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.42% | 3.77% | +54.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.55% | 5.13% | +48.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.41% | 5.13% | +59.28% |
Dividends
RKT vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison
RKT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RKT Rocket Companies, Inc. | 0.00% | 4.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.43% | 7.93% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.95% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RKT and SCYB have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RKT has higher volatility (20.75%) compared to SCYB (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RKT dropped -83.00% vs SCYB's -4.92%.
SCYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RKT and SCYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer