RKT.L vs. EOAN.DE
RKT.L (Reckitt Benckiser Group plc) and EOAN.DE (E.ON SE) are both stocks. RKT.L operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while EOAN.DE operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, RKT.L returned -1.34%/yr vs 15.04%/yr for EOAN.DE. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RKT.L vs. EOAN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RKT.L is traded in GBp, while EOAN.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EOAN.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RKT.L achieves a -23.90% return, which is significantly lower than EOAN.DE's 14.49% return. Over the past 10 years, RKT.L has underperformed EOAN.DE with an annualized return of -1.34%, while EOAN.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.04% annualized return.
RKT.L
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -3.21%
- YTD
- -23.90%
- 6M
- -22.66%
- 1Y
- -7.86%
- 3Y*
- -7.07%
- 5Y*
- -3.76%
- 10Y*
- -1.34%
EOAN.DE
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 14.49%
- 6M
- 19.56%
- 1Y
- 24.45%
- 3Y*
- 21.40%
- 5Y*
- 17.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.04%
RKT.L vs. EOAN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RKT.L Reckitt Benckiser Group plc | -23.90% | 29.40% | -6.57% | -2.84% | -6.76% | -0.22% | 9.53% | 4.93% | -10.76% | 2.69% |
EOAN.DE E.ON SE | 14.49% | 56.51% | -7.84% | 33.28% | -15.06% | 30.89% | 5.34% | 9.54% | -0.31% | 45.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between RKT.L and EOAN.DE is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2007 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RKT.L and EOAN.DE has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RKT.L vs. EOAN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
RKT.L
EOAN.DE
RKT.L vs. EOAN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RKT.L) and E.ON SE (EOAN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RKT.L | EOAN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.19 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 2.06 | -2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 4.95 | -5.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RKT.L | EOAN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 | 1.10 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.78 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | 0.65 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.10 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
RKT.L vs. EOAN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RKT.L drawdown since its inception was -66.15%, smaller than the maximum EOAN.DE drawdown of -77.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKT.L and EOAN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RKT.L | EOAN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.15% | -77.29% | +11.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.10% | -11.16% | -18.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.31% | -23.80% | -8.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.69% | -34.10% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.79% | -34.10% | -7.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.99% | -8.18% | -22.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.54% | -43.18% | +30.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.73% | 4.65% | +7.08% |
Volatility
RKT.L vs. EOAN.DE - Volatility Comparison
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RKT.L) and E.ON SE (EOAN.DE) have volatilities of 7.13% and 7.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RKT.L | EOAN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 7.03% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.75% | 17.18% | -0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.65% | 20.92% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.50% | 21.77% | +0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 22.89% | -0.53% |
Dividends
RKT.L vs. EOAN.DE - Dividend Comparison
RKT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.09%, more than EOAN.DE's 3.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EOAN.DE E.ON SE | 3.16% | 3.41% | 4.71% | 4.20% | 5.25% | 3.85% | 5.08% | 4.51% | 3.48% | 2.32% | 7.46% | 6.38% |
RKT.L Reckitt Benckiser Group plc | 10.09% | 3.43% | 4.06% | 3.45% | 3.03% | 2.75% | 2.67% | 2.83% | 2.80% | 2.34% | 2.13% | 2.06% |
Financials
RKT.L vs. EOAN.DE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reckitt Benckiser Group plc and E.ON SE. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RKT.L and EOAN.DE have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for RKT.L and EOAN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer