RKNG vs. XRT
RKNG (Defiance Retail Kings ETF) and XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. RKNG is actively managed, while XRT is passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RKNG charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XRT.
Performance
RKNG vs. XRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RKNG
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- -8.71%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRT
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- 6M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 3.77%
- 1Y
- 10.63%
- 3Y*
- 11.22%
- 5Y*
- -0.54%
- 10Y*
- 8.75%
RKNG vs. XRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RKNG Defiance Retail Kings ETF | -0.03% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | -2.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between RKNG and XRT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RKNG vs. XRT — Risk / Return Rank
RKNG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XRT
RKNG vs. XRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Retail Kings ETF (RKNG) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RKNG | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.72 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RKNG vs. XRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RKNG drawdown since its inception was -34.21%, smaller than the maximum XRT drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKNG and XRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RKNG | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.21% | -65.81% | +31.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.35% | -8.76% | -8.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.29% | -14.97% | +2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.01% | — |
Volatility
RKNG vs. XRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RKNG | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.90% | 20.68% | +40.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.90% | 26.89% | +34.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.90% | 27.16% | +33.74% |
RKNG vs. XRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RKNG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than XRT's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
RKNG vs. XRT - Dividend Comparison
RKNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RKNG Defiance Retail Kings ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 0.76% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.40% | 2.15% | 1.55% | 1.01% | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.52% | 1.36% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RKNG and XRT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for RKNG.
XRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for RKNG.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for RKNG and 0.35% for XRT.
Find the right allocation for RKNG and XRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer