RKNG vs. EATZ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RKNG (Defiance Retail Kings ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RKNG charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

RKNG vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Retail Kings ETF (RKNG) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RKNG

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 6.95%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EATZ

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RKNG vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RKNG Defiance Retail Kings ETF	18.70%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	-2.63%

Correlation

The correlation between RKNG and EATZ is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026	0.38

Return for Risk

RKNG vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Retail Kings ETF (RKNG) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RKNG	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.86%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.23%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RKNG	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.58%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.58%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.58%	—	—

RKNG vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RKNG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

RKNG vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

RKNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EATZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%
RKNG Defiance Retail Kings ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RKNG and EATZ in my portfolio?

RKNG and EATZ have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RKNG or EATZ?

On fees, RKNG is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RKNG or EATZ?

RKNG is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RKNG or EATZ?

EATZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for RKNG.

What is the main difference between RKNG and EATZ?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for RKNG and 1.00% for EATZ.