PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RKLZ vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RKLZ vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RKLB ETF (RKLZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RKLZ achieves a -89.18% return, which is significantly lower than SMST's -5.14% return.


RKLZ

1D
10.97%
1M
137.97%
YTD
-89.18%
6M
-87.03%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMST

1D
18.45%
1M
181.70%
YTD
-5.14%
6M
2.86%
1Y
236.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RKLZ vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RKLZ and SMST is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RKLZ vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RKLZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RKLZ vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RKLB ETF (RKLZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RKLZSMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.52

RKLZ vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RKLZ vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RKLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.10%, roughly equal to the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKLZ and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RKLZSMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.10%

-99.25%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-85.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.63%

-96.27%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.58%

-90.74%

+9.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.15%

Volatility

RKLZ vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RKLZSMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

46.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

130.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

207.29%

146.32%

+60.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

207.29%

167.25%

+40.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

207.29%

167.25%

+40.04%

RKLZ vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RKLZ and SMST have an expense ratio of 1.29%.


Dividends

RKLZ vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

Neither RKLZ nor SMST has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


RKLZ and SMST have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.29% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RKLZ and SMST have the same expense ratio: 1.29% per year.

RKLZ and SMST have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RKLZ and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer