PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RKLZ vs. AIPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RKLZ vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RKLB ETF (RKLZ) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RKLZ achieves a -91.34% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 36.84% return.


RKLZ

1D
-11.88%
1M
39.61%
6M
-85.07%
YTD
-91.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

AIPO

1D
2.23%
1M
-2.45%
6M
20.74%
YTD
36.84%
1Y
47.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
48.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$42.50M$37.98M$46.43M
$31.80M$39.06M$53.86M

RKLZ vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RKLZ and AIPO is -0.57, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

-0.57

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RKLZ vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RKLZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


AIPO
AIPO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
AIPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIPO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
AIPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIPO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RKLZ vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RKLB ETF (RKLZ) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RKLZAIPODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.44

RKLZ vs. AIPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RKLZ vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RKLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.10%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -24.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKLZ and AIPO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RKLZAIPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.10%

-24.36%

-74.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.10%

-12.94%

-85.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.05%

-5.34%

-78.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.38%

Volatility

RKLZ vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RKLZAIPODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

206.65%

37.59%

+169.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

206.65%

37.25%

+169.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

206.65%

37.25%

+169.40%

RKLZ vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RKLZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

RKLZ vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison

RKLZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RKLZ and AIPO have a correlation of -0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RKLZ.

AIPO has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for RKLZ.

RKLZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AIPO is Artificial Intelligence. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RKLZ and 0.69% for AIPO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RKLZ and AIPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer