PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RKLB vs. CIFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RKLB vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rocket Lab USA, Inc. (RKLB) and Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RKLB achieves a 21.19% return, which is significantly lower than CIFR's 75.75% return.


RKLB

1D
4.77%
1M
-41.08%
YTD
21.19%
6M
19.66%
1Y
138.95%
3Y*
148.64%
5Y*
10Y*

CIFR

1D
1.01%
1M
9.68%
YTD
75.75%
6M
70.77%
1Y
508.92%
3Y*
107.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RKLB vs. CIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RKLB
Rocket Lab USA, Inc.
21.19%173.89%360.58%46.68%-69.30%18.65%
CIFR
Cipher Digital Inc.
75.75%218.10%12.35%637.50%-87.90%-54.65%

Correlation

The correlation between RKLB and CIFR is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021

0.44

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RKLB:

$51.18B

CIFR:

$10.51B

EPS

RKLB:

-$0.33

CIFR:

-$2.33

PS Ratio

RKLB:

69.10

CIFR:

57.00

PB Ratio

RKLB:

22.60

CIFR:

14.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

RKLB:

$679.58M

CIFR:

$174.98M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RKLB:

$248.43M

CIFR:

-$172.84M

EBITDA (TTM)

RKLB:

-$177.36M

CIFR:

-$169.22M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RKLB vs. CIFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RKLB
RKLB Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
RKLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RKLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
RKLB Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
RKLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
RKLB Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

CIFR
CIFR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RKLB vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rocket Lab USA, Inc. (RKLB) and Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RKLBCIFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.45

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

10.19

-7.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.74

20.42

-13.68

RKLB vs. CIFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RKLB Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the CIFR Sharpe Ratio of 4.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RKLB and CIFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RKLB vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RKLB drawdown since its inception was -82.96%, smaller than the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKLB and CIFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RKLBCIFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.96%

-97.16%

+14.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.29%

-51.38%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.49%

-71.74%

+16.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.73%

-11.10%

-32.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.17%

-65.78%

+14.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.94%

25.59%

-5.65%

Volatility

RKLB vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison

Rocket Lab USA, Inc. (RKLB) and Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) have volatilities of 29.34% and 28.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RKLBCIFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.34%

28.28%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.01%

70.55%

+0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

93.61%

108.94%

-15.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.71%

121.68%

-39.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.71%

121.68%

-39.97%

Dividends

RKLB vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison

Neither RKLB nor CIFR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

RKLB vs. CIFR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rocket Lab USA, Inc. and Cipher Digital Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
200.35M
0
(RKLB) Total Revenue
(CIFR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RKLB and CIFR have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RKLB has higher volatility (29.34%) compared to CIFR (28.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RKLB dropped -82.96% vs CIFR's -97.16%.

CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.82 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RKLB and CIFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer