PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RJVI vs. PYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RJVI vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF (RJVI) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RJVI achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly higher than PYLD's 0.98% return.


RJVI

1D
0.22%
1M
0.79%
YTD
2.14%
6M
2.14%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PYLD

1D
0.04%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.98%
6M
1.43%
1Y
6.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RJVI vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RJVI and PYLD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025

0.78

RJVI vs. PYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RJVI
PYLD

Healthcare

14.6%

-

Financial Services

13.2%

-

Utilities

12.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

12.3%

-

Energy

11.0%
100.0%

Technology

11.0%

-

Communication Services

9.8%

-

Industrials

9.1%

-

Real Estate

6.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Healthcare

RJVI
14.6%
PYLD

-

Financial Services

RJVI
13.2%
PYLD

-

Utilities

RJVI
12.7%
PYLD

-

Consumer Defensive

RJVI
12.3%
PYLD

-

Energy

RJVI
11.0%
PYLD
100.0%

Technology

RJVI
11.0%
PYLD

-

Communication Services

RJVI
9.8%
PYLD

-

Industrials

RJVI
9.1%
PYLD

-

Real Estate

RJVI
6.2%
PYLD

-

Basic Materials

RJVI

-

PYLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

RJVI

-

PYLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RJVI vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RJVI

PYLD
PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RJVI vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF (RJVI) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RJVI vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RJVIPYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

2.05

-1.08

Drawdowns

RJVI vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RJVI drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, smaller than the maximum PYLD drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RJVI and PYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RJVIPYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-4.52%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-0.40%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.02%

-0.65%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

Volatility

RJVI vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RJVIPYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.14%

3.08%

+1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.14%

3.98%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.14%

3.98%

+0.16%

RJVI vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RJVI has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

RJVI vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

RJVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than PYLD's 6.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
PYLD
PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
6.29%6.21%6.40%2.72%
RJVI
RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF
2.60%0.93%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RJVI and PYLD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RJVI is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RJVI is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PYLD.

PYLD has the higher dividend yield at 6.29%, compared with 2.60% for RJVI.

They also come from different issuers: Carillon Tower Advisers and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for RJVI and 0.55% for PYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RJVI and PYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer