PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RJVI vs. SCMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RJVI vs. SCMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF (RJVI) and Sterling Capital Multi-Strategy Income ETF (SCMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RJVI achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly higher than SCMC's 1.87% return.


RJVI

1D
0.22%
1M
0.79%
YTD
2.14%
6M
2.14%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCMC

1D
0.08%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.87%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RJVI vs. SCMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RJVI and SCMC is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RJVI vs. SCMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF (RJVI) and Sterling Capital Multi-Strategy Income ETF (SCMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RJVI vs. SCMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RJVISCMCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

1.32

-0.35

Drawdowns

RJVI vs. SCMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RJVI drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, which is greater than SCMC's maximum drawdown of -1.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RJVI and SCMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RJVISCMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-1.91%

-1.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-0.12%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.02%

-0.36%

-0.66%

Volatility

RJVI vs. SCMC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RJVISCMCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.14%

2.83%

+1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.14%

2.83%

+1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.14%

2.83%

+1.31%

RJVI vs. SCMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RJVI has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than SCMC's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

RJVI vs. SCMC - Dividend Comparison

RJVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than SCMC's 2.17% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


RJVI and SCMC have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RJVI is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RJVI is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SCMC.

RJVI has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 2.17% for SCMC.

They also come from different issuers: Carillon Tower Advisers and Sterling Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for RJVI and 0.55% for SCMC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RJVI and SCMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer