PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIVRX vs. MRFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RIVRX vs. MRFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Riverbridge Growth Fund (RIVRX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIVRX achieves a -6.40% return, which is significantly lower than MRFOX's 4.87% return. Over the past 10 years, RIVRX has underperformed MRFOX with an annualized return of 11.28%, while MRFOX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.92% annualized return.


RIVRX

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.72%
6M
-3.84%
YTD
-6.40%
1Y
-5.68%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*
11.28%
ALL TIME*
11.46%

MRFOX

1D
-1.24%
1M
-0.50%
6M
3.84%
YTD
4.87%
1Y
11.84%
3Y*
13.29%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
15.92%
ALL TIME*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RIVRX vs. MRFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIVRX
Riverbridge Growth Fund
-6.40%4.55%22.07%31.71%-30.87%9.07%44.03%30.21%3.81%25.11%
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
4.87%10.05%17.10%17.68%5.06%17.71%15.19%36.26%1.89%25.92%

Correlation

The correlation between RIVRX and MRFOX is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.71

The correlation between RIVRX and MRFOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIVRX vs. MRFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RIVRX
RIVRX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
RIVRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIVRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIVRX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
RIVRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIVRX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

MRFOX
MRFOX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MRFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MRFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RIVRX vs. MRFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Riverbridge Growth Fund (RIVRX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIVRXMRFOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.19

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

1.55

-1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.97

4.55

-5.52

RIVRX vs. MRFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIVRX Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the MRFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIVRX and MRFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIVRX vs. MRFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIVRX drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, which is greater than MRFOX's maximum drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIVRX and MRFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIVRXMRFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.45%

-29.10%

-9.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.59%

-7.03%

-11.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.39%

-7.91%

-12.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

-12.98%

-25.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.45%

-29.10%

-9.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.06%

-1.37%

-8.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.07%

-2.34%

-4.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.29%

2.38%

+5.91%

Volatility

RIVRX vs. MRFOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Riverbridge Growth Fund (RIVRX) is 3.86%, while Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that RIVRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIVRXMRFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

4.45%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.48%

7.80%

+3.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.42%

10.40%

+4.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.73%

12.17%

+8.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.26%

14.18%

+6.08%

RIVRX vs. MRFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIVRX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MRFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

RIVRX vs. MRFOX - Dividend Comparison

RIVRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.95%, more than MRFOX's 1.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
1.54%1.62%4.59%0.46%0.35%6.78%2.68%1.39%1.94%2.06%0.60%0.00%
RIVRX
Riverbridge Growth Fund
29.95%28.03%4.56%0.00%0.00%4.28%3.29%1.43%7.91%0.09%3.61%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


RIVRX and MRFOX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRFOX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to RIVRX (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIVRX dropped -38.45% vs MRFOX's -29.10%.

MRFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIVRX and MRFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer