PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIVRX vs. FSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RIVRX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Riverbridge Growth Fund (RIVRX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIVRX achieves a -3.49% return, which is significantly lower than FSPGX's 9.01% return.


RIVRX

1D
0.98%
1M
3.39%
YTD
-3.49%
6M
-3.18%
1Y
1.50%
3Y*
11.03%
5Y*
4.16%
10Y*
12.13%

FSPGX

1D
0.72%
1M
7.25%
YTD
9.01%
6M
8.27%
1Y
28.79%
3Y*
25.69%
5Y*
15.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIVRX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIVRX
Riverbridge Growth Fund
-3.49%4.55%22.07%31.71%-30.87%9.07%44.03%30.21%3.81%24.15%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
9.01%18.54%33.27%42.77%-29.17%27.57%38.46%36.38%-1.79%27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between RIVRX and FSPGX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.91

The correlation between RIVRX and FSPGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIVRX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIVRX
RIVRX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
RIVRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIVRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIVRX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
RIVRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIVRX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPGX
FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIVRX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Riverbridge Growth Fund (RIVRX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RIVRXFSPGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.12

1.93

-1.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.26

2.60

-2.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.33

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

1.83

-1.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.22

6.14

-5.92

RIVRX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIVRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIVRX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RIVRXFSPGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

1.93

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.75

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.90

-0.27

Drawdowns

RIVRX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIVRX drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIVRX and FSPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIVRXFSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.45%

-32.66%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.59%

-16.17%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.39%

-23.32%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

-32.66%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.26%

0.00%

-7.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.03%

-6.38%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.02%

4.81%

+2.21%

Volatility

RIVRX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Riverbridge Growth Fund (RIVRX) is 3.08%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that RIVRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIVRXFSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

3.26%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.61%

11.58%

-0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.62%

15.41%

-1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.65%

21.49%

-0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.28%

21.55%

-1.27%

RIVRX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIVRX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

RIVRX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

RIVRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.05%, more than FSPGX's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.32%0.34%0.37%0.73%0.86%2.22%1.76%1.04%1.32%0.22%0.00%0.00%
RIVRX
Riverbridge Growth Fund
29.05%28.03%4.56%0.00%0.00%4.28%3.29%1.43%7.91%0.09%3.61%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


RIVRX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSPGX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to RIVRX (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIVRX dropped -38.45% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

FSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIVRX and FSPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer