PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIVN vs. MKC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RIVN vs. MKC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) and McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIVN achieves a -14.97% return, which is significantly higher than MKC's -27.49% return.


RIVN

1D
7.85%
1M
21.54%
YTD
-14.97%
6M
-9.01%
1Y
24.89%
3Y*
3.20%
5Y*
10Y*

MKC

1D
-0.57%
1M
5.61%
YTD
-27.49%
6M
-25.55%
1Y
-31.93%
3Y*
-16.44%
5Y*
-9.29%
10Y*
1.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIVN vs. MKC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RIVN
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
-14.97%48.20%-43.31%27.29%-82.23%-2.87%
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
-27.49%-8.33%13.97%-15.68%-12.65%19.76%

Correlation

The correlation between RIVN and MKC is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021

0.05

The correlation between RIVN and MKC shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RIVN:

$20.93B

MKC:

$13.19B

EPS

RIVN:

-$2.90

MKC:

$6.10

PS Ratio

RIVN:

3.68

MKC:

1.85

PB Ratio

RIVN:

4.73

MKC:

1.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

RIVN:

$5.53B

MKC:

$7.11B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RIVN:

$57.00M

MKC:

$2.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

RIVN:

-$3.18B

MKC:

$1.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIVN vs. MKC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIVN
RIVN Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RIVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIVN Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
RIVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIVN Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

MKC
MKC Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MKC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MKC Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIVN vs. MKC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) and McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIVNMKCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.80

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

-0.85

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.95

-1.69

+2.64

RIVN vs. MKC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIVN Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is higher than the MKC Sharpe Ratio of -1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIVN and MKC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIVN vs. MKC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIVN drawdown since its inception was -95.12%, which is greater than MKC's maximum drawdown of -52.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIVN and MKC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIVNMKCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.12%

-52.02%

-43.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.54%

-39.50%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.61%

-47.65%

-21.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.26%

-48.49%

-41.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.33%

-11.03%

-75.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.62%

19.92%

+1.70%

Volatility

RIVN vs. MKC - Volatility Comparison

Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) has a higher volatility of 22.66% compared to McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) at 6.12%. This indicates that RIVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIVNMKCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.66%

6.12%

+16.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.82%

23.28%

+26.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.46%

28.06%

+37.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.55%

24.34%

+53.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

77.55%

24.17%

+53.38%

Dividends

RIVN vs. MKC - Dividend Comparison

RIVN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
3.80%2.69%2.24%2.32%1.81%1.44%1.68%1.37%1.53%1.89%1.89%1.91%
RIVN
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RIVN vs. MKC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rivian Automotive, Inc. and McCormick & Company, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.38B
1.87B
(RIVN) Total Revenue
(MKC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RIVN vs. MKC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rivian Automotive, Inc. and McCormick & Company, Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-80.0%-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
8.6%
37.8%
Portfolio components
RIVN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rivian Automotive, Inc. reported a gross profit of 119.00M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.6%.

MKC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 708.90M and revenue of 1.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.8%.

RIVN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rivian Automotive, Inc. reported an operating income of -881.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of -63.8%.

MKC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported an operating income of 227.50M and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.

RIVN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rivian Automotive, Inc. reported a net income of -416.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of -30.1%.

MKC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in a net margin of 54.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RIVN and MKC have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RIVN has higher volatility (22.66%) compared to MKC (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIVN dropped -95.12% vs MKC's -52.02%.

RIVN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.31 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIVN and MKC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer