PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RITM vs. FBRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RITM vs. FBRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) and Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RITM having a -13.44% return and FBRT slightly lower at -13.93%.


RITM

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
-13.44%
6M
-13.58%
1Y
-9.98%
3Y*
9.45%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*
6.74%

FBRT

1D
2.80%
1M
-2.88%
YTD
-13.93%
6M
-15.70%
1Y
-11.63%
3Y*
-6.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RITM vs. FBRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RITM
Rithm Capital Corp.
-13.44%10.06%11.07%45.60%-14.44%-3.36%
FBRT
Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.
-13.93%-9.17%3.73%16.56%-3.86%-10.46%

Correlation

The correlation between RITM and FBRT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021

0.60

The correlation between RITM and FBRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.61 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RITM:

$5.20B

FBRT:

$673.78M

EPS

RITM:

$1.31

FBRT:

$0.71

PE Ratio

RITM:

7.01

FBRT:

11.84

PS Ratio

RITM:

0.91

FBRT:

2.06

PB Ratio

RITM:

0.69

FBRT:

0.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

RITM:

$5.61B

FBRT:

$411.64M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RITM:

$4.84B

FBRT:

$228.04M

EBITDA (TTM)

RITM:

$1.91B

FBRT:

$218.28M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RITM vs. FBRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RITM
RITM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
RITM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RITM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
RITM Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
RITM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
RITM Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FBRT
FBRT Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FBRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBRT Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FBRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBRT Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RITM vs. FBRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) and Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RITMFBRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.94

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

-0.50

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.78

-0.99

+0.21

RITM vs. FBRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RITM Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is comparable to the FBRT Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RITM and FBRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RITM vs. FBRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RITM drawdown since its inception was -81.11%, which is greater than FBRT's maximum drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RITM and FBRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RITMFBRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.11%

-31.30%

-49.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.31%

-23.51%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.31%

-30.02%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.79%

-27.65%

+5.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-11.30%

-4.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.86%

11.82%

+1.04%

Volatility

RITM vs. FBRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) is 7.23%, while Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT) has a volatility of 9.11%. This indicates that RITM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RITMFBRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.23%

9.11%

-1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.19%

23.56%

-4.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.55%

26.62%

-4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.47%

28.53%

-1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.18%

28.53%

+11.65%

Dividends

RITM vs. FBRT - Dividend Comparison

RITM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.88%, less than FBRT's 15.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBRT
Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.
15.01%14.16%11.32%10.51%11.01%1.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RITM
Rithm Capital Corp.
10.88%9.17%9.23%9.36%12.24%8.40%5.03%12.41%14.07%11.07%11.70%14.39%

Financials

RITM vs. FBRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rithm Capital Corp. and Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.38B
10.55M
(RITM) Total Revenue
(FBRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RITM and FBRT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBRT has higher volatility (9.11%) compared to RITM (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RITM dropped -81.11% vs FBRT's -31.30%.

FBRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.44 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RITM and FBRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer