PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RITM vs. ACR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RITM vs. ACR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) and ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. (ACR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RITM achieves a -13.44% return, which is significantly higher than ACR's -22.16% return. Over the past 10 years, RITM has outperformed ACR with an annualized return of 6.74%, while ACR has yielded a comparatively lower -6.13% annualized return.


RITM

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
-13.44%
6M
-13.58%
1Y
-9.98%
3Y*
9.45%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*
6.74%

ACR

1D
0.67%
1M
-16.70%
YTD
-22.16%
6M
-28.47%
1Y
-6.89%
3Y*
26.07%
5Y*
-0.49%
10Y*
-6.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RITM vs. ACR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RITM
Rithm Capital Corp.
-13.44%10.06%11.07%45.60%-14.44%17.07%-34.36%28.46%-10.35%27.83%
ACR
ACRES Commercial Realty Corp.
-22.16%32.14%67.88%16.46%-33.76%4.18%-66.22%28.24%12.00%14.79%

Correlation

The correlation between RITM and ACR is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2013

0.36

The correlation between RITM and ACR shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RITM:

$5.20B

ACR:

$108.94M

EPS

RITM:

$1.31

ACR:

$3.72

PE Ratio

RITM:

7.01

ACR:

4.47

PS Ratio

RITM:

0.91

ACR:

0.64

PB Ratio

RITM:

0.69

ACR:

0.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

RITM:

$5.61B

ACR:

$180.38M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RITM:

$4.84B

ACR:

$112.28M

EBITDA (TTM)

RITM:

$1.91B

ACR:

$67.14M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RITM vs. ACR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RITM
RITM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
RITM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RITM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
RITM Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
RITM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
RITM Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

ACR
ACR Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ACR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACR Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
ACR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACR Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RITM vs. ACR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) and ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. (ACR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RITMACRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.98

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

-0.21

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.78

-0.51

-0.27

RITM vs. ACR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RITM Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the ACR Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RITM and ACR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RITM vs. ACR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RITM drawdown since its inception was -81.11%, smaller than the maximum ACR drawdown of -92.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RITM and ACR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RITMACRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.11%

-92.50%

+11.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.31%

-33.69%

+6.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.31%

-33.69%

+6.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.61%

-61.70%

+25.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.11%

-91.51%

+10.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.79%

-60.82%

+39.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-40.75%

+24.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.86%

13.60%

-0.74%

Volatility

RITM vs. ACR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) is 7.23%, while ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. (ACR) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that RITM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RITMACRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.23%

13.29%

-6.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.19%

21.97%

-2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.55%

30.40%

-7.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.47%

34.67%

-7.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.18%

60.27%

-20.09%

Dividends

RITM vs. ACR - Dividend Comparison

RITM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.88%, while ACR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACR
ACRES Commercial Realty Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.04%4.74%2.13%15.73%18.34%
RITM
Rithm Capital Corp.
10.88%9.17%9.23%9.36%12.24%8.40%5.03%12.41%14.07%11.07%11.70%14.39%

Financials

RITM vs. ACR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rithm Capital Corp. and ACRES Commercial Realty Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.38B
42.94M
(RITM) Total Revenue
(ACR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RITM vs. ACR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rithm Capital Corp. and ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
68.8%
73.7%
Portfolio components
RITM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rithm Capital Corp. reported a gross profit of 949.57M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.8%.

ACR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. reported a gross profit of 31.63M and revenue of 42.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.7%.

RITM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rithm Capital Corp. reported an operating income of 142.52M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.3%.

ACR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. reported an operating income of 29.04M and revenue of 42.94M, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

RITM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rithm Capital Corp. reported a net income of 109.48M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.

ACR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. reported a net income of 4.09M and revenue of 42.94M, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RITM and ACR have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACR has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to RITM (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RITM dropped -81.11% vs ACR's -92.50%.

ACR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.23 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RITM and ACR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer