ACR vs. FNDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACR (ACRES Commercial Realty Corp.) is a stock, while FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Over the past 10 years, ACR returned -4.70%/yr vs 14.26%/yr for FNDX. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ACR vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. (ACR) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACR achieves a -10.54% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.57% return. Over the past 10 years, ACR has underperformed FNDX with an annualized return of -4.70%, while FNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.26% annualized return.

ACR

• 1D: -6.38%
• 1M: -12.31%
• YTD: -10.54%
• 6M: -15.23%
• 1Y: 2.58%
• 3Y*: 30.85%
• 5Y*: 2.91%
• 10Y*: -4.70%

FNDX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 3.88%
• YTD: 14.57%
• 6M: 14.58%
• 1Y: 32.32%
• 3Y*: 20.90%
• 5Y*: 12.82%
• 10Y*: 14.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACR vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACR ACRES Commercial Realty Corp.	-10.54%	32.14%	67.88%	16.46%	-33.76%	4.18%	-66.22%	28.24%	12.00%	14.79%
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	14.57%	16.94%	16.77%	18.23%	-6.92%	31.73%	9.12%	28.65%	-7.30%	17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ACR and FNDX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	0.34

The correlation between ACR and FNDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ACR vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACR

ACR Risk / Return Rank: 41
ACR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
ACR Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
ACR Omega Ratio Rank: 37
ACR Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
ACR Martin Ratio Rank: 42

FNDX

FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACR vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. (ACR) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACR	FNDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	3.18	-3.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.35	4.47	-4.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.59	-0.54
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.10	5.35	-5.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.21	20.97	-20.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACR vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACR Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACR and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACR	FNDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09	3.18	-3.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	0.85	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.08	0.82	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.03	0.79	-0.82

Drawdowns

ACR vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACR drawdown since its inception was -92.50%, which is greater than FNDX's maximum drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACR and FNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACR	FNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.50%	-37.72%	-54.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.62%	-6.06%	-19.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.70%	-16.30%	-13.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.70%	-19.06%	-42.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-91.51%	-37.72%	-53.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.97%	-0.13%	-54.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.71%	-3.55%	-37.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.46%	1.55%	+10.91%

Volatility

ACR vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. (ACR) has a higher volatility of 11.81% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 2.25%. This indicates that ACR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACR	FNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.81%	2.25%	+9.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.64%	7.25%	+14.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.96%	10.22%	+18.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.55%	15.18%	+19.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.21%	17.50%	+42.71%

Dividends

ACR vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

ACR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACR ACRES Commercial Realty Corp.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	8.04%	4.74%	2.13%	15.73%	18.34%
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	1.45%	1.63%	1.76%	1.82%	2.07%	1.64%	2.29%	2.23%	2.40%	1.86%	2.01%	2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACR and FNDX in my portfolio?

ACR and FNDX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACR or FNDX?

ACR has higher volatility (11.81%) compared to FNDX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACR dropped -92.50% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.