PortfoliosLab logo
ACR vs. VRT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ACR and VRT is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ACR vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. (ACR) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-31.30%
873.50%
ACR
VRT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ACR:

1.10

VRT:

0.04

Sortino Ratio

ACR:

1.56

VRT:

0.56

Omega Ratio

ACR:

1.22

VRT:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

ACR:

0.51

VRT:

0.05

Martin Ratio

ACR:

4.26

VRT:

0.11

Ulcer Index

ACR:

8.34%

VRT:

26.28%

Daily Std Dev

ACR:

32.32%

VRT:

73.66%

Max Drawdown

ACR:

-92.24%

VRT:

-71.24%

Current Drawdown

ACR:

-54.83%

VRT:

-37.74%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACR:

$139.01M

VRT:

$36.14B

EPS

ACR:

$1.15

VRT:

$1.72

PE Ratio

ACR:

16.35

VRT:

55.13

PS Ratio

ACR:

1.66

VRT:

4.30

PB Ratio

ACR:

0.32

VRT:

13.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACR:

$119.09M

VRT:

$8.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACR:

$104.93M

VRT:

$3.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

ACR:

$69.06M

VRT:

$1.46B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACR achieves a 14.55% return, which is significantly higher than VRT's -15.89% return.


ACR

YTD

14.55%

1M

0.16%

6M

14.69%

1Y

32.90%

5Y*

19.50%

10Y*

-6.14%

VRT

YTD

-15.89%

1M

49.67%

6M

-20.63%

1Y

0.77%

5Y*

54.43%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ACR vs. VRT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACR is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACR is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACR is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACR is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACR is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACR is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VRT is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VRT is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VRT is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VRT is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VRT is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VRT is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ACR vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. (ACR) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ACR Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is higher than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACR and VRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.10
0.04
ACR
VRT

Dividends

ACR vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

ACR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ACR
ACRES Commercial Realty Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.30%8.04%4.74%2.13%15.73%18.34%15.87%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.13%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ACR vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACR drawdown since its inception was -92.24%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACR and VRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-48.85%
-37.74%
ACR
VRT

Volatility

ACR vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. (ACR) is 17.47%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 23.63%. This indicates that ACR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
17.47%
23.63%
ACR
VRT

Financials

ACR vs. VRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20212022202320242025
28.94M
2.04B
(ACR) Total Revenue
(VRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items