ACR vs. VRT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ACR (ACRES Commercial Realty Corp.) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. ACR operates in REIT - Mortgage (Real Estate), while VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, ACR returned 4.59%/yr vs 67.94%/yr for VRT. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ACR vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. (ACR) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACR achieves a -4.45% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 106.51% return.

ACR

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: -6.64%
• YTD: -4.45%
• 6M: -1.40%
• 1Y: 8.86%
• 3Y*: 33.76%
• 5Y*: 4.59%
• 10Y*: -4.07%

VRT

• 1D: 3.43%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 106.51%
• 6M: 84.94%
• 1Y: 206.60%
• 3Y*: 156.88%
• 5Y*: 67.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACR vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ACR ACRES Commercial Realty Corp.	-4.45%	32.14%	67.88%	16.46%	-33.76%	4.18%	-66.22%	28.24%	-0.89%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	106.51%	42.80%	136.82%	251.81%	-45.25%	33.80%	69.36%	12.55%	-0.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ACR and VRT is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2018	0.18

The correlation between ACR and VRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (3 years) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap ACR : $133.74M VRT : $131.16B
EPS ACR : $3.72 VRT : $3.99
PE Ratio ACR : 5.49 VRT : 83.92
PEG Ratio ACR : 0.59 VRT : 0.37
PS Ratio ACR : 0.79 VRT : 12.06
PB Ratio ACR : 0.32 VRT : 30.90
Total Revenue (TTM) ACR : $180.38M VRT : $10.84B
Gross Profit (TTM) ACR : $112.28M VRT : $3.92B
EBITDA (TTM) ACR : $67.14M VRT : $2.35B

Return for Risk

ACR vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACR

ACR Risk / Return Rank: 47
ACR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
ACR Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
ACR Omega Ratio Rank: 45
ACR Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
ACR Martin Ratio Rank: 48

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 95
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 92
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACR vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. (ACR) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACR	VRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	3.62	-3.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.68	3.86	-3.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.48	-0.40
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.31	8.49	-8.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.63	24.38	-23.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACR vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACR Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACR and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACR	VRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32	3.62	-3.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	1.11	-0.97
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	1.05	-1.07

Drawdowns

ACR vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACR drawdown since its inception was -92.50%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACR and VRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACR	VRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.50%	-71.24%	-21.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.62%	-24.78%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.70%	-61.28%	+31.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.70%	-71.24%	+9.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-91.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.90%	-11.09%	-40.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.71%	-16.22%	-24.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.42%	8.63%	+3.79%

Volatility

ACR vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. (ACR) is 10.01%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 16.91%. This indicates that ACR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACR	VRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.01%	16.91%	-6.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.63%	44.81%	-24.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.25%	57.50%	-29.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.44%	61.71%	-27.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.19%	54.59%	+5.60%

Dividends

ACR vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

ACR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACR ACRES Commercial Realty Corp.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	8.04%	4.74%	2.13%	15.73%	18.34%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.06%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

ACR vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. and Vertiv Holdings Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ACR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. reported a gross profit of 31.63M and revenue of 42.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.7%.

VRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

ACR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. reported an operating income of 29.04M and revenue of 42.94M, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

VRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.

ACR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. reported a net income of 4.09M and revenue of 42.94M, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.

VRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACR and VRT in my portfolio?

ACR and VRT have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACR or VRT?

VRT has higher volatility (16.91%) compared to ACR (10.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACR dropped -92.50% vs VRT's -71.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.