RITA vs. USRT
RITA (ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF) and USRT (iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - RITA tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit IdealRatings Developed REITs Islamic Green Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross while USRT tracks the FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RITA returned 5.28%/yr vs 11.53%/yr for USRT. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. RITA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for USRT.
Performance
RITA vs. USRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RITA achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly lower than USRT's 12.59% return.
RITA
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.22%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 3.88%
- 1Y
- 7.90%
- 3Y*
- 5.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USRT
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 12.59%
- 6M
- 11.36%
- 1Y
- 15.26%
- 3Y*
- 11.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 6.21%
RITA vs. USRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RITA ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF | 5.12% | 3.93% | 1.93% | 9.66% | -29.30% | 5.53% |
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 12.59% | 2.44% | 8.58% | 13.64% | -24.43% | 5.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between RITA and USRT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021 | 0.95 |
The correlation between RITA and USRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
RITA vs. USRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RITA
USRT
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
RITA
USRT
Basic Materials
RITA
-
USRT
-
Communication Services
RITA
-
USRT
-
Consumer Cyclical
RITA
-
USRT
-
Consumer Defensive
RITA
-
USRT
-
Energy
RITA
-
USRT
-
Financial Services
RITA
-
USRT
Healthcare
RITA
-
USRT
-
Industrials
RITA
-
USRT
-
Technology
RITA
-
USRT
-
Utilities
RITA
-
USRT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RITA vs. USRT — Risk / Return Rank
RITA
USRT
RITA vs. USRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) and iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RITA | USRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.20 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 1.91 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | 6.15 | -3.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RITA | USRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 1.15 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.18 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
RITA vs. USRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RITA drawdown since its inception was -35.92%, smaller than the maximum USRT drawdown of -69.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RITA and USRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RITA | USRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.92% | -69.91% | +33.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -8.04% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.85% | -18.70% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.67% | -3.01% | -10.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.63% | -12.97% | -7.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 2.49% | +0.05% |
Volatility
RITA vs. USRT - Volatility Comparison
ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) and iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) have volatilities of 3.97% and 3.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RITA | USRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 3.92% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.46% | 9.25% | +0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.71% | 13.28% | -0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 18.89% | -1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 21.28% | -3.52% |
RITA vs. USRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RITA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than USRT's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
RITA vs. USRT - Dividend Comparison
RITA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than USRT's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RITA ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF | 2.72% | 2.50% | 3.12% | 3.25% | 2.41% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 2.67% | 3.07% | 2.85% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.27% | 3.12% | 3.34% | 5.66% | 3.44% | 3.98% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, RITA and USRT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
RITA has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to USRT (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RITA dropped -35.92% vs USRT's -69.91%.
On 3-year performance, USRT leads with 11.53% vs 5.28% for RITA. On fees, USRT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, USRT has performed better with a 11.53% return vs 5.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USRT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RITA.
RITA has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.67% for USRT.
RITA tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit IdealRatings Developed REITs Islamic Green Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while USRT tracks FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFB and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RITA and 0.08% for USRT.
USRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RITA and USRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer