PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RITA vs. HAUZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RITA vs. HAUZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) and Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RITA vs. HAUZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RITA
ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF
0.98%3.93%1.93%9.66%-29.30%5.53%
HAUZ
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF
-1.42%22.70%-5.44%6.29%-22.24%1.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RITA achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly higher than HAUZ's -1.42% return.


RITA

1D
0.62%
1M
-5.86%
YTD
0.98%
6M
0.43%
1Y
3.80%
3Y*
4.28%
5Y*
10Y*

HAUZ

1D
1.26%
1M
-9.09%
YTD
-1.42%
6M
-0.54%
1Y
17.11%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
0.10%
10Y*
3.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RITA vs. HAUZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RITA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HAUZ's 0.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RITA vs. HAUZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RITA
RITA Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
RITA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RITA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
RITA Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
RITA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
RITA Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

HAUZ
HAUZ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
HAUZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAUZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAUZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
HAUZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAUZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RITA vs. HAUZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) and Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RITAHAUZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.24

1.15

-0.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.44

1.64

-1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.22

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

1.26

-0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.26

5.27

-4.00

RITA vs. HAUZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RITA Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the HAUZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RITA and HAUZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RITAHAUZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

1.15

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.17

0.18

-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between RITA and HAUZ is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

RITA vs. HAUZ - Dividend Comparison

RITA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than HAUZ's 4.52% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RITA
ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF
2.83%2.50%3.12%3.25%2.41%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HAUZ
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF
4.52%4.46%4.50%3.50%1.99%4.84%3.37%3.69%1.93%2.59%2.18%9.42%

Drawdowns

RITA vs. HAUZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RITA drawdown since its inception was -35.92%, smaller than the maximum HAUZ drawdown of -39.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RITA and HAUZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RITAHAUZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.92%

-39.51%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.27%

-14.08%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.07%

-10.62%

-6.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.97%

-11.80%

-9.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

3.38%

-0.44%

Volatility

RITA vs. HAUZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) is 5.05%, while Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) has a volatility of 6.62%. This indicates that RITA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAUZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RITAHAUZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

6.62%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.76%

10.00%

-1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.98%

14.89%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.86%

15.76%

+2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

16.92%

+0.94%