RITA vs. SRET
RITA (ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF) and SRET (Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - RITA tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit IdealRatings Developed REITs Islamic Green Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross while SRET tracks the Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RITA returned 7.99%/yr vs 11.33%/yr for SRET. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RITA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for SRET.
Performance
RITA vs. SRET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RITA achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly higher than SRET's 5.98% return.
RITA
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 6M
- 9.64%
- 1Y
- 10.95%
- 3Y*
- 7.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRET
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 5.98%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 15.16%
- 3Y*
- 11.33%
- 5Y*
- 1.74%
- 10Y*
- 1.13%
RITA vs. SRET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RITA ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF | 9.63% | 3.93% | 1.93% | 9.66% | -29.30% | 4.81% |
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 5.98% | 18.09% | -1.55% | 9.85% | -18.24% | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between RITA and SRET is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021 | 0.78 |
The correlation between RITA and SRET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RITA vs. SRET — Risk / Return Rank
RITA
SRET
RITA vs. SRET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RITA | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.23 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 1.61 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.26 | 6.61 | -2.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RITA vs. SRET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RITA drawdown since its inception was -35.92%, smaller than the maximum SRET drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RITA and SRET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RITA | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.92% | -66.98% | +31.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -9.48% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.85% | -18.87% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.96% | -22.59% | +12.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.50% | -22.48% | +1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.30% | +0.28% |
Volatility
RITA vs. SRET - Volatility Comparison
ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) at 3.75%. This indicates that RITA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RITA | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 3.75% | +1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 9.14% | +1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.46% | 11.53% | +1.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 16.49% | +1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 24.60% | -6.80% |
RITA vs. SRET - Expense Ratio Comparison
RITA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SRET's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
RITA vs. SRET - Dividend Comparison
RITA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than SRET's 7.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RITA ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF | 2.61% | 2.50% | 3.12% | 3.25% | 2.41% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 7.95% | 7.98% | 8.72% | 7.21% | 8.30% | 6.33% | 8.88% | 7.83% | 8.54% | 8.20% | 8.08% | 7.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RITA and SRET have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RITA has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to SRET (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RITA dropped -35.92% vs SRET's -66.98%.
On 3-year performance, SRET leads with 11.33% vs 7.99% for RITA. On fees, RITA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SRET has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SRET has performed better with a 11.33% return vs 7.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RITA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SRET.
SRET has the higher dividend yield at 7.95%, compared with 2.61% for RITA.
RITA tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit IdealRatings Developed REITs Islamic Green Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SRET tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFB and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RITA and 0.58% for SRET.
SRET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RITA and SRET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer