PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RITA vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RITA vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RITA achieves a 14.27% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 35.21% return.


RITA

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.61%
6M
12.27%
YTD
14.27%
1Y
18.83%
3Y*
8.06%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.35%

GSG

1D
-2.68%
1M
9.90%
6M
27.47%
YTD
35.21%
1Y
38.52%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
14.69%
10Y*
8.24%
ALL TIME*
-2.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$17.98M$16.40M$25.53M
$160.52K$90.77K$56.08K

RITA vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RITA
ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF
14.27%3.93%1.93%9.66%-29.30%4.81%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
35.21%5.93%8.52%-5.51%24.08%2.33%

Correlation

The correlation between RITA and GSG is -0.17, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021

0.04

The correlation between RITA and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RITA vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RITA
RITA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RITA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RITA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RITA Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
RITA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
RITA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RITA vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RITAGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.28

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.06

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.60

6.61

+1.00

RITA vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RITA Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RITA and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RITA vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RITA drawdown since its inception was -35.92%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RITA and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RITAGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.92%

-89.62%

+53.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-18.81%

+9.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.85%

-18.81%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.15%

-59.18%

+53.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.17%

-63.67%

+43.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

5.85%

-3.37%

Volatility

RITA vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) is 4.54%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 8.75%. This indicates that RITA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RITAGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

8.75%

-4.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

22.27%

-11.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.67%

24.37%

-10.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.75%

22.89%

-5.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.75%

22.07%

-4.32%

RITA vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RITA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

RITA vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

RITA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RITA
ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF
2.32%2.50%3.12%3.25%2.41%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


RITA and GSG have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSG has higher volatility (8.75%) compared to RITA (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RITA dropped -35.92% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 3-year performance, GSG leads with 13.26% vs 8.06% for RITA. On fees, RITA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RITA has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GSG has performed better with a 13.26% return vs 8.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RITA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.

RITA has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

RITA is categorized as REIT, while GSG is Commodities. RITA tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit IdealRatings Developed REITs Islamic Green Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFB and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RITA and 0.75% for GSG.

GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RITA and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer