PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RITA vs. AGZD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RITA vs. AGZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RITA achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly higher than AGZD's 2.22% return.


RITA

1D
0.09%
1M
-2.22%
YTD
5.12%
6M
3.88%
1Y
7.90%
3Y*
5.28%
5Y*
10Y*

AGZD

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.67%
YTD
2.22%
6M
2.64%
1Y
5.26%
3Y*
6.02%
5Y*
4.32%
10Y*
3.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RITA vs. AGZD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RITA
ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF
5.12%3.93%1.93%9.66%-29.30%5.53%
AGZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund
2.22%4.35%6.64%7.15%1.17%0.11%

Correlation

The correlation between RITA and AGZD is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RITA vs. AGZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RITA
RITA Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
RITA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RITA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
RITA Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
RITA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
RITA Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

AGZD
AGZD Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AGZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGZD Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AGZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGZD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RITA vs. AGZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RITAAGZDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.36

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

6.09

-5.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.11

19.08

-15.96

RITA vs. AGZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RITA Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the AGZD Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RITA and AGZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RITAAGZDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

1.83

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.64

-0.76

Drawdowns

RITA vs. AGZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RITA drawdown since its inception was -35.92%, which is greater than AGZD's maximum drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RITA and AGZD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RITAAGZDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.92%

-8.46%

-27.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-0.87%

-8.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.85%

-1.71%

-19.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.67%

-0.39%

-13.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.63%

-0.77%

-19.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

0.28%

+2.26%

Volatility

RITA vs. AGZD - Volatility Comparison

ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD) at 1.03%. This indicates that RITA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RITAAGZDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

1.03%

+2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

1.99%

+7.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

2.89%

+9.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.76%

3.59%

+14.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.76%

3.72%

+14.04%

RITA vs. AGZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RITA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AGZD's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

RITA vs. AGZD - Dividend Comparison

RITA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than AGZD's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund
3.99%4.12%3.96%6.07%8.61%1.66%2.28%2.83%2.62%2.31%1.81%1.66%
RITA
ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF
2.72%2.50%3.12%3.25%2.41%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RITA and AGZD have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RITA has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to AGZD (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RITA dropped -35.92% vs AGZD's -8.46%.

On 3-year performance, AGZD leads with 6.02% vs 5.28% for RITA. On fees, AGZD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, AGZD has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AGZD has performed better with a 6.02% return vs 5.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGZD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RITA.

AGZD has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 2.72% for RITA.

RITA is categorized as REIT, while AGZD is Nontraditional Bonds. RITA tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit IdealRatings Developed REITs Islamic Green Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while AGZD tracks Bloomberg Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Zero Duration. They also come from different issuers: ETFB and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RITA and 0.23% for AGZD.

AGZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RITA and AGZD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer